Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351059›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021

Arthroscopic C-Shaped Release Around the Greater Trochanter for Gluteal Muscle Contracture.

Xiangyu Tang, Wei Qi, Yujie Liu, Yi Xiang, Baiqing Zhang, Haipeng Li, Zhongli Li, Zhigang Wang, Dong Wang, Chunbao Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Clinical Efficacy of Modified Arthroscopic Revision Release of Gluteal Muscle Contracture With Residual Symptoms After Open Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
  7. Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients with Gluteal Muscle Contracture: Single-Institution Results from a High-Volume Cohort.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiangyu TangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Wei QiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Yujie LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Yi XiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army 985 Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Baiqing ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-0198
Haipeng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-6360
Zhongli LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Zhigang WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Chunbao LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-2526
Chinese General Hospital College of Nursing and Liberal Arts · PHPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CN

Funding

Key basic research project of basic strengthening plan Grant Number 2020-jcjq-zs-264the Military medicine innovation research project of PLA General Hospital Grant Number cx19004Youth Top Project of Military Medical Science and Technology Grant Number 19QNP070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the outcomes of C-shaped release around the greater trochanter in gluteal muscle contracture under arthroscopy.

methodsFrom December 2016 to January 2018, 185 patients with gluteal muscle contracture who treated under arthroscopy were reviewed, including 69 males and 116 females. All patients had a history of repeated intramuscular injection into the buttocks. The follow signs were positive in all the patients before surgery: squatting and crouching disability, difficulty in crossing the leg, Ober's sign positive, clicking sound during rotation of the hip. The C-shaped release around the greater trochanter under arthroscopy was performed in 96 cases (C-shaped release group) with an average age of 24.6 ± 4.9 years old, and conventional gluteal muscle contracture release under arthroscopy was performed in 89 cases (conventional release group) with an average age of 25.1 ± 5.0 years. The released tissues in the C-shaped release group: iliotibial band (ITB) about 5 cm distal to the proximal end of the greater trochanter, the contracture tissue near the posterior and superior of the greater trochanter, which depended on both intraoperative physical examination and arthroscopic observation. The released tissues in conventional release group: the contracture tissues in gluteal muscles according to observation under arthroscopy. The gluteal muscle contracture disability scale (GDS) and Visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated before surgery and at the last follow-up.

resultsThe average release time after making arthroscopic operation space for each lower limb were 12.2 ± 3.2 min in the C-shaped release group, and 21.4 ± 6.1 min in the conventional release group (P = 0.000). All the patients were followed for at least of 2 years after operation. There was one case of wound hematoma in the C-shaped release group and five cases in the conventional release group(P = 0.079), abductor weakness (IV level)occurred in two patients in the C-shaped release group and five cases in the conventional release group (P = 0.208). GDS was 49.3 ± 17.3 (22 to 70) in theC-shaped release group and 48.1 ± 15.6 (23 to 69) in the conventional release group before surgery (P = 0.622), 91.7 ± 5.2 (83 to 100) in the C-shaped release group and 90.2 ± 6.1 (83 to 98) in the conventional release group (P = 0.073) with difference nearly significant at last follow-up.

conclusionArthroscopic C-shaped release around the greater trochanter had less operation time, acceptable complication occurrence, and it has an optimistic outcome for gluteal muscle contracture under arthroscope.

Indexed as

AdultArthroscopyButtocksContractureDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPain MeasurementYoung AdultArthroscopyDisabilityGluteal muscle contracture

Identifiers

PMID34351059
PMCPMC8523753
OpenAlexW3187787701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.