Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350969›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

Dosimetric evaluation of ovaries and pelvic bones associated with clinical outcomes in patients receiving total body irradiation with ovarian shielding.

Keiko Akahane, Katsuyuki Shirai, Masaru Wakatsuki, Masato Suzuki, Shogo Hatanaka, Yuta Takahashi, Masahiro Kawahara, Kazunari Ogawa, Satoru Takahashi, Noriko Oyama-Manabe and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Keiko AkahaneDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Katsuyuki ShiraiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Masaru WakatsukiQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Masato SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Shogo HatanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-8550, Japan.
Yuta TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Masahiro KawaharaDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Kazunari OgawaDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Satoru TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Noriko Oyama-ManabeDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Masahiro AshizawaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 350-8550, Japan.
Shun-Ichi KimuraDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Shinichi KakoDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Yoshinobu KandaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 350-8550, Japan.
Jichi Medical University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total body irradiation (TBI) with ovarian shielding is expected to preserve fertility among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients with myeloablative TBI-based regimens. However, the radiation dose to the ovaries that preserves ovarian function in TBI remains poorly understood. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the dose to the shielded organs is associated with relapse risk. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the relationship between fertility and the dose to the ovaries, and between relapse risk and the dose to the pelvic bones. A total of 20 patients (median age, 23 years) with standard-risk hematologic diseases were included. Median follow-up duration was 31.9 months. The TBI prescribed dose was 12 Gy in six fractions for three days. Patients' ovaries were shielded with cylinder-type lead blocks. The dose-volume parameters (D98% and Dmean) in the ovaries and the pelvic bones were extracted from the dose-volume histogram (DVH). The mean ovary Dmean for all patients was 2.4 Gy, and 18 patients recovered menstruation (90%). The mean ovary Dmean for patients with menstrual recovery and without recovery were 2.4 Gy and 2.4 Gy, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.998). Hematological relapse was observed in five patients. The mean pelvis Dmean and pelvis D98% for relapse and non-relapse patients were 11.6 Gy and 11.7 Gy and 5.6 Gy and 5.3 Gy, respectively. Both parameters showed no significant difference (P = 0.827, 0.807). In conclusion, TBI with ovarian shielding reduced the radiation dose to the ovaries to 2.4 Gy, and preserved fertility without increasing the risk of relapse.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnemia, AplasticFemaleFertility PreservationFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemiaMenstruationMyeloablative AgonistsMyelodysplastic SyndromesOrgans at RiskOvaryPelvic BonesRadiation InjuriesMyeloablative Agonistsfertilityovarian shieldingrelapsetotal body irradiation (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID34350969
PMCPMC8438484
OpenAlexW3191769099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.