Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350955›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

Analysis on the accuracy of CT-guided radioactive I-125 seed implantation with 3D printing template assistance in the treatment of thoracic malignant tumors.

Zhe Ji, Haitao Sun, Yuliang Jiang, Yi Chen, Fuxin Guo, Jinghong Fan, Junjie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhe JiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haitao SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuliang JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fuxin GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jinghong FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFB1311300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article analyzes the accuracy of needle track and dose of a 3-dimensional printing template (3DPT) in the treatment of thoracic tumor with radioactive I-125 seed implantation (RISI). A total of 28 patients were included. The technical process included: (i) preoperative CT positioning, (ii) preoperative planning design, (iii) 3DPT design and printing, (iv) 3DPT alignment, (v) puncture and seed implantation. The errors of needle position and dosimetric parameters were analyzed. A total of 318 needles were used. The mean errors in needle depth, needle insertion point, needle tip and needle angle were 0.52 ± 0.48 cm, 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, 4.4 ± 2.9 mm and 2.8 ± 1.7°, respectively. The differences between actual needle insertion angle and needle depth and those designed in the preoperative were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean values of all the errors of the chest wall cases were smaller than those of the lungs, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the D90 calculated in the postoperative plan and those designed in the preoperative and intraoperative plans (p > 0.05). Some dosimetric parameters of preoperative plans such as V100, V200, CI and HI were not consistent with that of preoperative plans, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistical difference in the dosimetric parameters between the postoperative plans and intraoperative plans (p > 0.05). We conclude that for thoracic tumors, even under the guidance of 3DPT, there will be errors. The plan should be optimized in real time during the operation.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBrachytherapyFemaleHumansIodine RadioisotopesMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesRadiography, InterventionalRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedThoracic NeoplasmsYoung AdultIodine-125Iodine Radioisotopes3D-printing templatedoserrorradioactive seed implantationthoracic tumor

Identifiers

PMID34350955
PMCPMC8438469
OpenAlexW3191410107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.