Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350705›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2021

The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.

M J M M Hoeijmakers, W Huberts, M C M Rutten, F N van de Vosse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M J M M HoeijmakersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9942-7597
W HubertsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-4785
M C M RuttenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
F N van de VosseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Eindhoven University of Technology · NLAnsys (United States) · USMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is widely adopted in the cardiovascular research community to study hemodynamics, and will become increasingly important for personalized medicine. However, segmentation of the flow domain is not exact and geometric uncertainty can be expected which propagates through the computational model, leading to uncertainty in model output. Seventy-four aortic-valves were segmented from computed tomography images at peak systole. Statistical shape modeling was used to obtain an approximate parameterization of the original segmentations. This parameterization was used to train a meta-model that related the first five shape mode coefficients and flowrate to the CFD-computed transvalvular pressure-drop. Consequently, shape uncertainty in the order of 0.5 and 1.0 mm was emulated by introducing uncertainty in the shape mode coefficients. A global variance-based sensitivity analysis was performed to quantify output uncertainty and to determine relative importance of the shape modes. The first shape mode captured the opening/closing behavior of the valve and uncertainty in this mode coefficient accounted for more than 90% of the output variance. However, sensitivity to shape uncertainty is patient-specific, and the relative importance of the fourth shape mode coefficient tended to increase with increases in valvular area. These results show that geometric uncertainty in the order of image voxel size may lead to substantial uncertainty in CFD-computed transvalvular pressure-drops. Moreover, this illustrates that it is essential to assess the impact of geometric uncertainty on model output, and that this should be thoroughly quantified for applications that wish to use image-based CFD models.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisArterial PressureHemodynamicsHumansModels, CardiovascularUncertaintyaortic valve stenosiscomputational fluid dynamicsmeta-modelingsensitivity analysisstatistical shape modelinguncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID34350705
PMCPMC9286381
OpenAlexW3188114831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.