Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350686›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2021

Primary Health Care Nurses' Perceptions of Risk During COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.

Christine Ashley, Sharon James, Catherine Stephen, Ruth Mursa, Susan McInnes, Anna Williams, Kaara Calma, Elizabeth Halcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine AshleySchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-9553
Sharon JamesSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-3447
Catherine StephenSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3864-1300
Ruth MursaSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-7181
Susan McInnesSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3113-2930
Anna WilliamsSchool of Nursing, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0349-4248
Kaara CalmaSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-368X
Elizabeth HalcombSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-986X

Funding

University of Wollongong / Australian College of Nursing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCOVID-19 has presented health care professionals with unprecedented challenges. Significant risks have emerged as nurses have continued to work in delivering frontline health care during the pandemic. Feeling "at risk" has significant deleterious effects on nurses. The study sought to explore the perceptions of risk by Australian primary health care nurses (PHC) during COVID-19.

methodsTwenty-five Australian PHC nurses were purposively recruited from survey respondents who indicated a willingness to be interviewed. Phone interviews were undertaken between June and August 2020. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically.

findingsParticipants shared concerns about risks in the workplace that emerged during COVID-19 and described the strategies used to mitigate these identified risks. Three themes were identified: (a) Professional concerns, (b) Personal/family concerns, and (c) Patient needs.

conclusionsUnderstanding PHC nurses' perceptions of risk during COVID-19 provides an important insight into how they can be better supported to manage the risks that they face and feel safer in their workplace. Ensuring that PHC nurses are well-supported is important to optimize job satisfaction, reduce burnout and improve patient care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a need to ensure that nurses feel safe during crises such as pandemics to protect both individual nurses and the broader workforce. Protecting the health workforce is essential to optimizing service delivery and promoting health outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesAustraliaHumansPerceptionPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2community nursingfamily practicenursing workforcepandemicprimary health carerisk

Identifiers

PMID34350686
PMCPMC8447477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.