Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350589›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

Methods for estimating the cost of treat-and-release emergency department visits.

Gary T Pickens, Brian Moore, Mark W Smith, Kimberly W McDermott, Amanda Mummert, Zeynal Karaca

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06730737 (Brief Lifestyle Medicine Preventive Randomized Prospective Interactive Educational Intervention in the Primary Care Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06730737 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Brief Lifestyle Medicine Preventive Randomized Prospective Interactive Educational Intervention in the Primary Care Clinic

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrinity Health-LivoniaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsPrevention Harmful Effects, Health Maintenance, Preventive Health Care, Dietary HabitsArmsVideo preventive education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gary T PickensIBM Watson Health, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-185X
Brian MooreIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark W SmithCATHEXIS, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Kimberly W McDermottIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Amanda MummertIBM Watson Health, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Zeynal KaracaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-4476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate and compare approaches to estimating the service delivery cost of emergency department (ED) visits from total charge data only. DATA SOURCES: The 2013-2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) public use files. STUDY

designCompare a baseline approach (requiring cost-center-level charge detail) and four alternative methods (relying on total charges only) for estimating ED visit costs. Estimation errors are calculated after applying each method to a sample of ED visits, treating estimates from the baseline approach as the "true" cost. Performance metrics are calculated at the visit and hospital levels. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsThe charges, revenue center codes, and patient/hospital characteristics were extracted from the SEDD. Detailed costs and charges were extracted from HCRIS public use files. PRINCIPAL

findingsBaseline ("true") ED visit costs increased from $383 to $420 per visit between 2013 and 2017. Three methods performed comparatively well estimating mean cost per visit. The method using an overall cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) for all ancillary cost centers without regression adjustment (ANC-CCR) performed the worst, overestimating "true" costs by $63-$113 per visit. The other three methods, which used CCRs computed from selected cost centers, exhibited much smaller bias, with two of the methods yielding estimates within $2 of the "true" cost in 2017. Compared with ANC-CCR, the other three methods had more compact estimation error distributions. The estimated mean visit costs from all four methods have relatively small statistical variance, with 95% confidence intervals for mean cost in a hospital with 25,000 ED visits ranging between $4 and $7.

conclusionsWhen cost-center-level charge detail for ED visits is unavailable, alternative methods relying on total ED charges can estimate ED service costs for patient and hospital segments.

Indexed as

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Emergency Service, HospitalHospital ChargesHospital CostsHumansModels, EconomicResearch DesignUnited Statescosts and cost analysisdirect service costsemergency medical servicesemergency servicefees and chargeshospital chargeshospital costs

Identifiers

PMID34350589
PMCPMC8522566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.