Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350586›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

International comparison of health spending and utilization among people with complex multimorbidity.

Jose F Figueroa, Irene Papanicolas, Kristen Riley, Olukorede Abiona, Mina Arvin, Femke Atsma, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Nicholas Bowden, Carl Rudolf Blankart, Sarah Deeny and 14 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Robotic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy During the Initial Phase of a Robotic Pancreatectomy Program.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characteristics of High-Resource Health System Users in Rural and Remote Regions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jose F FigueroaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3811-257X
Irene PapanicolasDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8000-3185
Kristen RileyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Olukorede AbionaCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mina ArvinRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5944-2431
Enrique Bernal-DelgadoInstitute for Health Sciences in Aragon (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-3298
Nicholas BowdenDunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4589-9956
Carl Rudolf BlankartKPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6719-0038
Sarah DeenyThe Health Foundation, London, UK.
Francisco Estupiñán-RomeroInstitute for Health Sciences in Aragon (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-8120
Robin GauldOtago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Philip HaywoodCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nils JanlovThe Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hannah KnightThe Health Foundation, London, UK.
Luca LorenzoniHealth Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-2985
Alberto MarinoDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1588-8746
Zeynep OrInstitute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6860-3735
Anne PenneauInstitute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France.
Kosta ShatrovKPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Onno van de GalienZilveren Kruis, Leusden, The Netherlands.
Kees van GoolCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Walter WodchisInstitute of Health Policy Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-7031
Ashish K JhaBrown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6602-6444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore cross-country differences in spending and utilization across different domains of care for a multimorbid persona with heart failure and diabetes. DATA SOURCES: We used individual-level administrative claims or registry data from inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) across 11 countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States (US). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsData collected by ICCONIC partners. STUDY

designWe retrospectively analyzed age-sex standardized utilization and spending of an older person (65-90 years) hospitalized with a heart failure exacerbation and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes across five domains of care: hospital care, primary care, outpatient specialty care, post-acute rehabilitative care, and outpatient drugs. PRINCIPAL

findingsSample sizes ranged from n = 1270 in Spain to n = 21,803 in the United States. Mean age (standard deviation [SD]) ranged from 76.2 (5.6) in the Netherlands to 80.3 (6.8) in Sweden. We observed substantial variation in spending and utilization across care settings. On average, England spent $10,956 per person in hospital care while the United States spent $30,877. The United States had a shorter length of stay over the year (18.9 days) compared to France (32.9) and Germany (33.4). The United States spent more days in facility-based rehabilitative care than other countries. Australia spent $421 per person in primary care, while Spain (Aragon) spent $1557. The United States and Canada had proportionately more visits to specialist providers than primary care providers. Across almost all sectors, the United States spent more than other countries, suggesting higher prices per unit.

conclusionAcross 11 countries, there is substantial variation in health care spending and utilization for a complex multimorbid persona with heart failure and diabetes. Drivers of spending vary across countries, with the United States being the most expensive country due to high prices and higher use of facility-based rehabilitative care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDeveloped CountriesDiabetes MellitusEuropeHealth Care CostsHeart FailureHumansMultimorbidityNorth AmericaPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexdiabeteshealth care spendingheart failurehigh-cost patientshigh needinternational comparison

Identifiers

PMID34350586
PMCPMC8579210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.