ArticleUncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging, and graphs in biomedical image analysis : Second International Workshop, UNSURE 2020, and Third International Workshop, GRAIL 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI...2020
Graph Matching Based Connectomic Biomarker with Learning for Brain Disorders.
Article in Uncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging, and graphs in biomedical image analysis : Second International Workshop, UNSURE 2020, and Third International Workshop, GRAIL 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI..., 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell graph analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting local recurrence and identifying spatial relationship biomarkers.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Big Data, Small Bias: Harmonizing Diffusion MRI-Based Structural Connectomes to Mitigate Site-Related Bias in Data Integration.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Graph-matching distance between individuals' functional connectomes varies with relatedness, age, and cognitive score.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Connectomic assessment of injury burden and longitudinal structural network alterations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion MRI and functional MRI enabled evaluation of the brain as an information processing network that is called connectome. Connectomic analysis has led to numerous findings on the organization of the brain its pathological changes with diseases, providing imaging-based biomarkers that help in diagnosis and prognosis. A large majority of connectomic biomarkers benefit either from graph-theoretical measures that evaluate brain's network structure, or use standard metrics such as Euclidean distance or Pearson's correlation to show between-connectomes relations. However, such methods are limited in diagnostic evaluation of diseases, because they do not simultaneously measure the difference between individual connectomes, incorporate disease-specific patterns, and utilize network structure information. To address these limitations, we propose a graph matching based method to quantify connectomic similarity, which can be trained for diseases at functional systems level to provide a subject-specific biomarker assessing the disease. We validate our measure on a dataset of patients with traumatic brain injury and demonstrate that our measure achieves better separation between patients and controls compared to commonly used connectomic similarity measures. We further evaluate the vulnerability of the functional systems to the disease by utilizing the parameter tuning aspect of our method. We finally show that our similarity score correlates with clinical scores, highlighting its potential as a subject-specific biomarker for the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.