Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350428›Full record

ArticleUncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging, and graphs in biomedical image analysis : Second International Workshop, UNSURE 2020, and Third International Workshop, GRAIL 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI...2020

Graph Matching Based Connectomic Biomarker with Learning for Brain Disorders.

Rui Sherry Shen, Jacob A Alappatt, Drew Parker, Junghoon Kim, Ragini Verma, Yusuf Osmanlıoğlu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Uncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging, and graphs in biomedical image analysis : Second International Workshop, UNSURE 2020, and Third International Workshop, GRAIL 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI..., 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui Sherry ShenDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jacob A AlappattDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Drew ParkerDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Junghoon KimDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, CUNY School of Medicine, City College of New York, New York City, USA.
Ragini VermaDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Yusuf OsmanlıoğluDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USCity College of New York · US

Funding

Harmonization for multisite Connectomics: parsing heterogeneity and creating markers in ASDR01MH117807 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VERMA, RAGINI · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion MRI and functional MRI enabled evaluation of the brain as an information processing network that is called connectome. Connectomic analysis has led to numerous findings on the organization of the brain its pathological changes with diseases, providing imaging-based biomarkers that help in diagnosis and prognosis. A large majority of connectomic biomarkers benefit either from graph-theoretical measures that evaluate brain's network structure, or use standard metrics such as Euclidean distance or Pearson's correlation to show between-connectomes relations. However, such methods are limited in diagnostic evaluation of diseases, because they do not simultaneously measure the difference between individual connectomes, incorporate disease-specific patterns, and utilize network structure information. To address these limitations, we propose a graph matching based method to quantify connectomic similarity, which can be trained for diseases at functional systems level to provide a subject-specific biomarker assessing the disease. We validate our measure on a dataset of patients with traumatic brain injury and demonstrate that our measure achieves better separation between patients and controls compared to commonly used connectomic similarity measures. We further evaluate the vulnerability of the functional systems to the disease by utilizing the parameter tuning aspect of our method. We finally show that our similarity score correlates with clinical scores, highlighting its potential as a subject-specific biomarker for the disease.

Indexed as

ConnectomeGraph edit distanceGraph matchingImaging biomarkerLearning edit costsMCMC

Identifiers

PMID34350428
PMCPMC8329857
OpenAlexW3092129332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.