ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021
Classification of Myocardial
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based CT-Less Cardiac Segmentation of PET Images: A Robust Methodology for Multi-Tracer Nuclear Cardiovascular Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo perform automated myocardial segmentation and uptake classification from whole-body fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, consecutive patients who underwent FDG PET imaging for oncologic indications were included (July-August 2018). The left ventricle (LV) on whole-body FDG PET images was manually segmented and classified as showing no myocardial uptake, diffuse uptake, or partial uptake. A total of 609 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 14 [standard deviation]; 309 women) were included and split between training (60%, 365 patients), validation (20%, 122 patients), and testing (20%, 122 patients) datasets. Two sequential neural networks were developed to automatically segment the LV and classify the myocardial uptake pattern using segmentation and classification training data provided by human experts. Linear regression was performed to correlate findings from human experts and deep learning. Classification performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsThere was moderate agreement of uptake pattern between experts and deep learning (as a fraction of correctly categorized images) with 78% (36 of 46) for no uptake, 71% (34 of 48) for diffuse uptake, and 71% (20 of 28) for partial uptake. There was no bias in LV volume for partial or diffuse uptake categories
conclusionDeep learning was able to segment and classify myocardial uptake patterns on FDG PET images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.