Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350385›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2021

Adjunctive Volasertib in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial.

Hartmut Döhner, Argiris Symeonidis, Dries Deeren, Judit Demeter, Miguel A Sanz, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Jordi Esteve, Walter Fiedler, Kimmo Porkka, Hee-Je Kim and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. PLK1 inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Only InfantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Proposals for Clinical Trials in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Hartmut DöhnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Argiris SymeonidisHematology Division, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.
Dries DeerenAZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Judit DemeterSemmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Miguel A SanzDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Achilles AnagnostopoulosHematology Department, General Hospital G. Papanikolaou, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Jordi EsteveHospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Walter FiedlerDepartment of Medicine II, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kimmo PorkkaDepartment of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Hee-Je KimCatholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Je-Hwan LeeAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kensuke UsukiNTT Medical Center Tokyo, Japan.
Stefano D'ArdiaA.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Chul Won JungSamsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Olga SalameroHospital Vall d'Hebron/VHIO/UAB-Medicine, Barcelona, Spain.
Heinz-August HorstUKSH Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Christian RecherCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, IUCT-Oncopole, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
Philippe RousselotCentre Hospitalier de Versailles, University Versailles Saint-Quentin and Paris Saclay, Le Chesnay, France.
Irwindeep SandhuDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Koen TheunissenJessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium.
Felicitas TholMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Konstanze DöhnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Veronica TeleanuDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel J DeAngeloDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tomoki NaoeNational Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Mikkael A SekeresCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Valerie BelsackSCS Boehringer Ingelheim Comm.V, Brussels, Belgium.
Miaomiao GeBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
Tillmann TaubeBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach, Germany.
Oliver G OttmannGoethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DEAsan Medical Center · KRAZ Delta · BEAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITBoehringer Ingelheim (Belgium) · BEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USCentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRCleveland Clinic · USConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEG. Papanikolaou General Hospital · GRHelsinki University Hospital · FIHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESJessa Hospital · BEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENational Hospital Organization · JPNTT Medical Center · JPSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo-like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4-wk cycles), combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twice daily, days 1-10; n = 444), or LDAC plus placebo (P; n = 222). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Primary ORR analysis at recruitment completion included patients randomized ≥5 months beforehand; ORR was 25.2% for V+LDAC and 16.8% for P+LDAC (n = 371; odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-2.89];

Identifiers

PMID34350385
PMCPMC8328241
OpenAlexW3193211635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.