Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350376›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2021

Financial Burden of Discarded Weight-based Antineoplastic Drugs to Payers and Patients in the Private Insurance Market.

Ya-Chen Tina Shih, Ying Xu, Hui Zhao, Deborah Schrag, James Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ya-Chen Tina ShihSection of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-3864
Ying XuSection of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-4337
Hui ZhaoSection of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-1139
Deborah SchragDivision of Population Sciences and the Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-5717
James YaoDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1875-3962

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Implementation and Evaluation of an Expanded Bilingual Electronic Symptom Management Program across a Multi-site, Fully-integrated Comprehensive Cancer CenterUM1CA233035 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2018 to 2021
$8.1M
Targeted Oral Anticancer Agents: Patterns of Indicated and Off-Label Use, the Associated Factors, and Economic ImplicationsR01CA225647 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225647NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA233035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Our study estimated insurance payments and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses associated with discarded weight-based intravenous antineoplastic drugs for privately insured US adult patients with cancer. Methods: We identified patients who received weight-based antineoplastic drugs from a 2017 MarketScan health risk assessment (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) linked to claims data. Using weight information in the health risk assessment, we derived the recommended dose and calculated the percentage of drugs discarded. We applied β-regression to determine factors associated with the discarded percentages. To compare patients with and without high-deductible plans, we employed a generalized linear model and a 2-part model to examine insurance payment and OOP expense, respectively. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: Of 27 350 claims for 58 weight-based antineoplastic drugs from 1970 patients, the median discarded percentage was 9.8% (mean [SD] = 12.8% [10.5%]). Aside from drug and tumor type, statistically significantly higher discarded percentages were found for patients in the lowest weight group (5.5% [95% confidence interval = 4.7% to 6.4%]; Conclusions: Private insurers incurred substantial financial burden from discarded weight-based antineoplastic drugs. Although the OOP expenses of discarded drugs were modest for most privately insured patients with cancer, approximately 5% spent more than $400 on the discarded drugs. Policies designed to reduce drug waste from single-dose, weight-based antineoplastic drugs should evaluate their financial consequences for payers and patients.

Indexed as

Body WeightDrug CostsDrug Dosage CalculationsHealth ExpendituresAdministration, IntravenousAntineoplastic AgentsDeductibles and CoinsuranceDrug PackagingFemaleFinancial StressHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrivate SectorAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34350376
PMCPMC8328094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.