Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350233›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD): a survey of four journals in laboratory medicine.

Fei-Fei Zheng, Wei-Hong Shen, Fang Gong, Zhi-De Hu, Giuseppe Lippi, Ana-Maria Šimundić, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Mario Plebani, Kaiping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei-Fei ZhengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Wei-Hong ShenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Fang GongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Zhi-De HuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ana-Maria ŠimundićDepartment of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Zagreb University, Zagreb, Croatia.
Patrick M M BossuytDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mario PlebaniDepartment of Medicine, University of Padova, and Department of Integrated Diagnostics, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Kaiping ZhangEditorial Office, AME Publishing Company, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement has been updated in 2015. Many diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies have been published in medical laboratory journals, but their adherence to the updated STARD statement remains unknown.

methodsWe searched the PubMed database to verify studies published in 4 laboratory journals, including

resultsA total of 45 studies were included in this analysis. Overall, 18 out of 34 STARD items were reported. The items (adherence rate) of sample size estimation (4%), adverse events (9%), protocol (9%), registration (16%), missing value (22%), indeterminate results (18%), and cross-tabulation (22%) were the most frequently unreported items.

conclusionsAdherence to the STARD statement in DTA articles published in laboratory medicine seems as yet unsatisfactory. Our study emphasizes the necessity to improve the reporting quality of DTA studies published in medical laboratory journals.

Indexed as

diagnostic test accuracy (DTA)laboratory medicineSTARD statement

Identifiers

PMID34350233
PMCPMC8263879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.