Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350115›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

A Deep Unsupervised Learning Model for Artifact Correction of Pelvis Cone-Beam CT.

Guoya Dong, Chenglong Zhang, Xiaokun Liang, Lei Deng, Yulin Zhu, Xuanyu Zhu, Xuanru Zhou, Liming Song, Xiang Zhao, Yaoqin Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guoya DongState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Chenglong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Xiaokun LiangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Lei DengShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yulin ZhuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xuanyu ZhuSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Xuanru ZhouShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Liming SongShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yaoqin XieShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly used in adaptive radiation therapy (ART). However, compared with planning computed tomography (PCT), CBCT image has much more noise and imaging artifacts. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the image quality and HU accuracy of CBCT. In this study, we developed an unsupervised deep learning network (CycleGAN) model to calibrate CBCT images for the pelvis to extend potential clinical applications in CBCT-guided ART.

methodsTo train CycleGAN to generate synthetic PCT (sPCT), we used CBCT and PCT images as inputs from 49 patients with unpaired data. Additional deformed PCT (dPCT) images attained as CBCT after deformable registration are utilized as the ground truth before evaluation. The trained uncorrected CBCT images are converted into sPCT images, and the obtained sPCT images have the characteristics of PCT images while keeping the anatomical structure of CBCT images unchanged. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed CycleGAN, we use additional nine independent patients for testing.

resultsWe compared the sPCT with dPCT images as the ground truth. The average mean absolute error (MAE) of the whole image on testing data decreased from 49.96 ± 7.21HU to 14.6 ± 2.39HU, the average MAE of fat and muscle ROIs decreased from 60.23 ± 7.3HU to 16.94 ± 7.5HU, and from 53.16 ± 9.1HU to 13.03 ± 2.63HU respectively.

conclusionWe developed an unsupervised learning method to generate high-quality corrected CBCT images (sPCT). Through further evaluation and clinical implementation, it can replace CBCT in ART.

Indexed as

cone beam computed tomographyplanning computed tomographyradiation oncologyscatter correctionunsupervised deep learning

Identifiers

PMID34350115
PMCPMC8327750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.