ArticleJournal of microscopy and ultrastructure
Histopathological Study of Verrucous Lesions and its Mimics.
Article in Journal of microscopy and ultrastructure. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An artificial intelligence model of whole-slide pathology specimens differentiating cutaneous high-grade squamous proliferations.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Assessing the prognosis mortality in patients with cutaneous verrucous carcinoma using Lasso-cox regression model: a retrospective study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Analyzing Verrucopapillary Lesions of the Oral Cavity: Retracing the Clinicopathological Conundrum.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- A huge verrucous carcinoma of the lower lip reconstructed by double Abbe flap: A case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cutaneous verrucous carcinoma: A clinicopathological study of 21 cases with long-term clinical follow-up.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextVerrucous lesions pose a diagnostic challenge to the clinicians as well as pathologists. There are few discrete histological features which if looked for carefully can help differentiate them.
aimThe aim of this study is to bring into light the histological features of several verrucous lesions occuring on skin and mucosa lined by squamous epithelium. SETTINGS AND
designThis is a 6-month prospective and retrospective study done on cutaneous and squamous mucosal biopsies with an exophytic pattern of growth. Clinical details along with the diagnosis were retrieved from the case files and correlated with the histological diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND
methodsOnly hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were studied.
resultsOf the 35 cases, 10 (28.5%) were female and 25 (71.4%) were male. The size of the lesions ranged from 0.5 cm to 6.5 cm. The site of lesions included anogenital (8 cases, 22.8%), cutaneous (24 cases, 68.5%), and oral mucosal (3 cases, 8.5%) areas. Warts were found to be the most common lesions (14 cases, 40%), of which cutaneous warts comprised 9 cases (64%) and genital warts comprised 5 cases (36%). It was observed that benign warts were clinically confused with other rare cutaneous lesions such as polyps and cysts. Malignant counterpart of a wart or condyloma called as warty carcinoma was not known to many and was mistaken for a conventional squamous cell carcinoma.
conclusionHistology is of utmost importance in differentiating the several verrucous lesions because sometimes clinical appearance may mimic one another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.