Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350096›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Elbow reconstruction after excision of proximal ulna tumors: Challenges and solutions.

Ashish Gulia, Manish Pruthi, Srinath Gupta, Shravan Nadkarni

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashish GuliaDept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Manish PruthiAssistant Professor, Bone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Srinath GuptaFellow, Bone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Shravan NadkarniAssistant Professor (adhoc), Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most malignant bone tumors are treated with surgical excision, adhering to oncologic principles, followed by reconstruction to preserve form and function whenever feasible. Primary bone tumors around the elbow are rare accounting for <1% of all skeletal tumors. They pose a reconstructive challenge, due to the complex interplay between the osseous & capsulo-ligamentous structures which is essential for elbow stability and function. Tumors affecting the proximal ulna are rare and reconstruction of the defects following these tumors is extremely challenging. Various reconstruction options like arthrodesis, autogenous bone grafts, allografts, re-implantation of sterilized tumor bone, pseudoarthrosis, and endoprosthesis have been tried with variable success. However, due to lack of standardization and the rarity of the site, surgeons are often in a dilemma to choose the correct option. This can lead to suboptimal functional outcomes and long-term failures. In this article, we reviewed the published literature on proximal ulnar tumors and noted the pros and cons of various reconstructive procedures. We have also attempted to formulate reconstruction recommendations based on the level of resection of proximal ulna.

Indexed as

AllograftAutograftBiological reconstructionElbow functionEndoprosthetic reconstructionSingle bone forearm

Identifiers

PMID34350096
PMCPMC8319519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.