ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021
Elbow reconstruction after excision of proximal ulna tumors: Challenges and solutions.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Elbow Reconstruction After Complete Ulnar Resection for Ewing's Sarcoma: Radial Neck Transposition as a Biomechanical Alternative.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Novel Surgical Reconstruction Using a 3D Printed Cement Mold Following Resection of a Rare Case of Proximal Ulna Osteosarcoma: A Case Report and Description of the Surgical Technique.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Outcomes of management of primary benign aggressive or malignant bone tumors around the elbow by limb-salvage surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Elbow hemiarthroplasty with a 3D-printed prosthesis for distal humeral bone defects after tumor excision: a case report.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most malignant bone tumors are treated with surgical excision, adhering to oncologic principles, followed by reconstruction to preserve form and function whenever feasible. Primary bone tumors around the elbow are rare accounting for <1% of all skeletal tumors. They pose a reconstructive challenge, due to the complex interplay between the osseous & capsulo-ligamentous structures which is essential for elbow stability and function. Tumors affecting the proximal ulna are rare and reconstruction of the defects following these tumors is extremely challenging. Various reconstruction options like arthrodesis, autogenous bone grafts, allografts, re-implantation of sterilized tumor bone, pseudoarthrosis, and endoprosthesis have been tried with variable success. However, due to lack of standardization and the rarity of the site, surgeons are often in a dilemma to choose the correct option. This can lead to suboptimal functional outcomes and long-term failures. In this article, we reviewed the published literature on proximal ulnar tumors and noted the pros and cons of various reconstructive procedures. We have also attempted to formulate reconstruction recommendations based on the level of resection of proximal ulna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.