ReviewCureus2021
Surveillance of Gallbladder Polyps: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost distribution and Monte Carlo simulation of financial risk under DRG-based prospective payment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder polyps: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Hidden signals in the gallbladder: a clinicopathological deep dive into 148 polyps among 11,108 surgeries.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Establishing a radiomics model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps exceeding 10 mm.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and gallbladder polyp development: an observational study.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Current considerations for the surgical management of gallbladder adenomas.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps in patients with different age level based on preoperative ultrasound: a multi-center retrospective real-world study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- A Bayesian network model to predict neoplastic risk for patients with gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm based on preoperative ultrasound features.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Gallbladder polyps and the challenge of distinguishing benign lesions from cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Critical Analysis of the Updated Guidelines for Management of Gallbladder Polyps.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Precursor Lesions of Gallbladder Carcinoma: Disease Concept, Pathology, and Genetics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little has been documented in existing literature regarding incidentally found gallbladder (GB) polyps. These clinically asymptomatic lesions are mostly benign, with only 5% progressing to malignancy. GB cancer, although rare, presents as an end-stage incurable disease. According to the current guidelines, cholecystectomy is recommended for polyps >10 mm in size for a better outcome. Thus, it is essential to know the clinical picture, surveillance, and treatment of these polyps earlier in the course of the disease to avoid the advancement of polyps to malignancy. This paper discusses the signs and symptoms, surveillance, treatment, and prognosis of GB polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.