Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350053›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2021

Gaussian process-based kernel as a diagnostic model for prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus risk using non-linear heart rate variability features.

R Shashikant, Uttam Chaskar, Leena Phadke, Chetankumar Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R ShashikantDepartment of Instrumentation and Control, College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Uttam ChaskarDepartment of Instrumentation and Control, College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Leena PhadkeDepartment of Physiology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, India.
Chetankumar PatilDepartment of Instrumentation and Control, College of Engineering, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of the study was to develop a low-cost, non-invasive diagnostic model for the early prediction of T2DM risk and validation of this model on patients. The model was designed based on the machine learning classification technique using non-linear Heart rate variability (HRV) features. The electrocardiogram of the healthy subjects (n = 35) and T2DM subjects (n = 100) were recorded in the supine position for 15 min, and HRV features were extracted. The significant non-linear HRV features were identified through statistical analysis. It was found that Poincare plot features (SD1 and SD2) can differentiate the T2DM subject data from healthy subject data. Several machine learning classifiers, such as Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Naïve Bayes, and Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC), have classified the data based on the cross-validation approach. A GP classifier was implemented using three kernels, namely radial basis, linear, and polynomial kernel, considering the ability to handle the non-linear data. The classifier performance was evaluated and compared using performance metrics such as accuracy(AC), sensitivity(SN), specificity(SP), precision(PR), F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC). Initially, all non-linear HRV features were selected for classification, but the specificity of the model was the limitation. Thus, only two Poincare plot features were used to design the diagnostic model. Our diagnostic model shows the performance using GPC based linear kernel as AC of 92.59%, SN of 96.07%, SP of 81.81%, PR of 94.23%, F1 score of 0.95, and AUC of 0.89, which are more extensive compared to other classification models. Further, the diagnostic model was deployed on the hardware module. Its performance on unknown/test data was validated on 65 subjects (healthy n = 15 and T2DM n = 50). Considering the desirable performance of the diagnostic model, it can be used as an initial screening test tool for a healthcare practitioner to predict T2DM risk.

Indexed as

Detrended fluctuation analysisDiagnostic modelElectrocardiogramGaussian process classifierHeart rate variabilityPoincare plotType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID34350053
PMCPMC8316508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.