Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350051›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2021

Hidden Markov model-based heartbeat detector using electrocardiogram and arterial pressure signals.

Miguel Altuve, Nelson F Monroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miguel AltuveValencian International University, Valencia, Spain.
Nelson F MonroyFaculty of Systems and Informatics Engineering, Pontifical Bolivarian University, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-6589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automatic detection of a heartbeat is commonly performed by detecting the QRS complex in the electrocardiogram (ECG), however, various noise sources and missing data can jeopardize the reliability of the ECG. Therefore, there is a growing interest in combining the information from many physiological signals to accurately detect heartbeats. To this end, hidden Markov models (HMMs) are used in this work to jointly exploit the information from ECG, arterial blood pressure (ABP) and pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) signals in order to conceive a heartbeat detector. After preprocessing the physiological signals, a sliding window is used to extract an observation sequence to be passed through two HMMs (previously trained on a training dataset) in order to obtain the log-likelihoods of observation and signals a detection if the difference of log-likelihoods exceeds an adaptive threshold. Several HMM-based heartbeat detectors were conceived to exploit the information from the ECG, ABP and PAP signals from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2014, and MGH/MF Waveform databases. A grid search methodology was used to optimize the duration of the observation sequence and a multiplicative factor to form the adaptive threshold. Using the optimal parameters found on a training database through 10-fold cross-validation, sensitivity and positive predictivity above 99% were obtained on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia and PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2014 databases, while they are above 95% in the MGH/MF waveform database using ECG and ABP signals. Our detector approach showed detection performances comparable with the literature in the three databases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-021-00192-x.

Indexed as

Arterial pressureElectrocardiogramHeartbeat detectionHidden Markov modelMultimodal

Identifiers

PMID34350051
PMCPMC8316507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.