Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34350007›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Abstract concepts in interaction: the need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions.

Chiara Fini, Vanessa Era, Federico Da Rold, Matteo Candidi, Anna M Borghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Abstract word dropout and cross-speaker misalignment of word concreteness are features of conversation in aging.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brain-wide representation of social knowledge.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Abstract concepts and simulated competition.Psychological research · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Editorial concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. LearningPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. On the social nature of abstraction: cognitive implications of interaction and diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara FiniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9939-4745
Vanessa EraSCNLab Department of Psychology, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5288-1378
Federico Da RoldInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Matteo CandidiSCNLab Department of Psychology, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Italy.
Anna M BorghiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITNational Research Council · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

concepts (ACs, e.g. 'justice') are more complex compared with concrete concepts (CCs) (e.g. 'table'). Indeed, they do not possess a single object as a referent, they assemble quite heterogeneous members and they are more detached from exteroceptive and more grounded in interoceptive experience. Recent views have hypothesized that interpersonal communication is particularly crucial to acquire and use ACs. The current study investigates the reliance of ACs/CCs representation on interpersonal behaviour. We asked participants to perform a motor interaction task with two avatars who embodied two real confederates. Before and after the motor interaction task, the two confederates provided participants with hints in a concept guessing task associated with visual stimuli: one helped in guessing ACs and the other, CCs. A control study we performed both with the materials employed in the main experiment and with other materials, confirmed that associating verbal concepts with visual images was more difficult with ACs than with CCs. Consistently, the results of the main experiment showed that participants asked for more hints with ACs than CCs and were more synchronous when interacting with the avatar corresponding to the AC's confederate. The results highlight an important role of sociality in grounding ACs.

Indexed as

abstract conceptscooperative behaviourjoint actionkinematic indexessocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID34350007
PMCPMC8316795
OpenAlexW3168583930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.