ArticleChemical science2021
Analog quantum simulation of chemical dynamics.
Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oscillator-qubit generalized quantum signal processing: a case study of the uracil cation vibronic model.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Scalable entangling gates on ion qubits via structured light addressing.Science advances · 2026Article
- Roadmap for Molecular Benchmarks in Nonadiabatic Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Review
- Quantum simulation of spin-boson models with structured bath.Nature communications · 2025Article
- High-Frequency Tails in Spectral Densities.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
- Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer.Nature physics · 2025Article
- Trapped-ion quantum simulation of electron transfer models with tunable dissipation.Science advances · 2024Article
- Perspective on Theoretical and Experimental Advances in Atmospheric Photochemistry.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Review
- Seeking a quantum advantage with trapped-ion quantum simulations of condensed-phase chemical dynamics.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024Review
- Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection.Nature chemistry · 2023Article
- Quantum simulation of conical intersections using trapped ions.Nature chemistry · 2023Article
- Predicting molecular vibronic spectra using time-domain analog quantum simulation.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Native qudit entanglement in a trapped ion quantum processor.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrafast chemical reactions are difficult to simulate because they involve entangled, many-body wavefunctions whose computational complexity grows rapidly with molecular size. In photochemistry, the breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation further complicates the problem by entangling nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom. Here, we show that analog quantum simulators can efficiently simulate molecular dynamics using commonly available bosonic modes to represent molecular vibrations. Our approach can be implemented in any device with a qudit controllably coupled to bosonic oscillators and with quantum hardware resources that scale linearly with molecular size, and offers significant resource savings compared to digital quantum simulation algorithms. Advantages of our approach include a time resolution orders of magnitude better than ultrafast spectroscopy, the ability to simulate large molecules with limited hardware using a Suzuki-Trotter expansion, and the ability to implement realistic system-bath interactions with only one additional interaction per mode. Our approach can be implemented with current technology;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.