Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34349851›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of oncology2021

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Kidist Tarekegn, Ana Colon Ramos, Balraj Singh, Harry G Sequeira Gross, Sachin Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Types of Cancer and Research Covered inWorld journal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kidist TarekegnDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY 10457, USA.
Ana Colon RamosDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY 10457, USA.
Balraj SinghDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Saint Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ 07503, USA.
Harry G Sequeira GrossDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY 10457, USA.
Sachin GuptaHospital Medicine, Tower Health Reading Hospital, West Reading, PA 19611, USA.
St. Barnabas Hospital · USReading Hospital · USSaint Joseph's University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though classical Hodgkin lymphoma is highly curable, the outcome of patients with a refractory or relapsed disease has been disappointing. Multiple lines of therapy are available for patients after their first failure, and most respond to subsequent therapies. However, there is a sizable proportion that remains relapsing/recurrent even after several lines of therapy. The overall prognosis of patients with relapsing and recurrent classical Hodgkin lymphoma (rrcHL) has been very disappointing until recently. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor antibodies have recently been approved to treat relapsed and refractory cHL and have significantly improved the outcome of patients with rrcHL. The approved immune checkpoint inhibitors for relapsed and refractory cHL are nivolumab and pembrolizumab. In the Checkmate 205 study nivolumab demonstrated an objective response rate of 69% with an acceptable safety profile. Similarly, pembrolizumab demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 69% with a complete remission rate (CRR) of 22.4% in the KEYNOTE-087 study in heavily pretreated patients with rrcHL.

Indexed as

Checkpoint inhibitorsNivolumabPembrolizumabRelapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID34349851
PMCPMC8297052
OpenAlexW3180789353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.