Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34349827›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Supplementation on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xufang Gu, Zhichao Liu, Shengwei Gao, Li Ma, Jinhong Chen, Zhenxing Wang, Anmin Lu, Zhizhong Wang, Baohe Wang, Yuhong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xufang GuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-829X
Zhichao LiuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3379-6258
Shengwei GaoTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Li MaTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jinhong ChenTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhenxing WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Anmin LuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhizhong WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Baohe WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Yuhong LiTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-5449
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIschemic preconditioning (IPC) has gradually been promoted in clinical practice to lower the risk of cardiovascular surgery and postoperative complications. We investigated the role of IPC on vascular endothelial function and the relationship between IPC, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and brachial artery diameter (BAD).

methodsSystematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception to March 20, 2020. This research included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with adults, and the values of FMD and BAD were considered as the primary outcomes. Ten studies comprising 292 participants were included in the meta-analysis.

resultsRegarding FMD, we observed beneficial effects of IPC on endothelial function (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.82; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 3.01;

conclusionsOur meta-analysis indicated a significant effect of IPC on the endothelial function of the blood vessels, affecting FMD but not BAD.

Identifiers

PMID34349827
PMCPMC8328691
OpenAlexW3185318797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.