ArticleComputational statistics2019
Permutation based testing on covariance separability.
Article in Computational statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clustering of longitudinal interval-valued data via mixture distribution under covariance separability.Journal of applied statistics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Separability is an attractive feature of covariance matrices or matrix variate data, which can improve and simplify many multivariate procedures. Due to its importance, testing separability has attracted much attention in the past. The procedures in the literature are of two types, likelihood ratio test (LRT) and Rao's score test (RST). Both are based on the normality assumption or the large-sample asymptotic properties of the test statistics. In this paper, we develop a new approach that is very different from existing ones. We propose to reformulate the null hypothesis (the separability of a covariance matrix of interest) into many sub-hypotheses (the separability of the sub-matrices of the covariance matrix), which are testable using a permutation based procedure.We then combine the testing results of sub-hypotheses using the Bonferroni and two-stage additive procedures. Our permutation based procedures are inherently distribution free; thus it is robust to non-normality of the data. In addition, unlike the LRT, they are applicable to situations when the sample size is smaller than the number of unknown parameters in the covariance matrix. Our numerical study and data examples show the advantages of our procedures over the existing LRT and RST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.