ArticleProfessional psychology, research and practice2021
A Mixed-Method Analysis on the Impacts of a System-Driven Implementation of Multiple Child Evidence-Based Practices on Community Mental Health Providers.
Article in Professional psychology, research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Employing survival analysis of administrative claims to identify prospective predictors of evidence-based practice sustainment versus provider turnover.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2025Article
- Applying best practices for health disparities work to create a treatment adaptation framework for culturally diverse communities: A mixed-methods approach.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2022Article
- Provider Self-Reported Use and Usefulness of Intervention Strategies for Externalizing Behaviors in Youths with ASD.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Initiatives to scale up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in routine care are likely to have myriad impacts on community providers, but these impacts have not yet been examined in depth. This is especially true within the context of simultaneous implementation of multiple evidence-based practices. The aim of this study was to characterize the multifaceted impacts on community mental health therapists within a system-driven implementation of multiple EBPs for youth and families. Semistructured interview and survey data were gathered from 60 therapists at 11 agencies contracted with the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health to deliver EBPs within the Prevention and Early Intervention initiative. Therapists' accounts of impacts varied, and were either predominately negative, predominantly positive, or mixed-valence. Mixed-methods analyses using Kruskal-Wallis tests showed therapist valence groups varied on mean levels of self-reported burnout on surveys. Themes from qualitative data revealed several favorable (e.g., increased EBP knowledge, structure) and unfavorable (e.g., distress, feeling constrained by EBPs) impacts of county-contracted EBP implementation. These findings inform the development and implementation of future system-driven EBP initiatives that consider therapist perspective to optimize positive impacts and minimize negative impacts on therapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.