Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34349335›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

To Compare the Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia between Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants with 0.5% Ropivacaine by Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Study.

Preeti Kumari, Raj Bahadur Singh, Kumar Saurabh, Shilpi Pal, Ganesh Kumar Ram, Rakesh Kumar Anand

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Preeti KumariDepartment of Anaesthesiology (Trauma and Emergency), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Raj Bahadur SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology (Trauma and Emergency), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Kumar SaurabhDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ruban Memorial Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Shilpi PalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ganesh Kumar RamDepartment of Anaesthesiology (Trauma and Emergency), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Rakesh Kumar AnandDepartment of General Surgery, ESI Medical College, Patna, Bihar, India.
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · INPatna Medical College and Hospital · INCalcutta National Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a very safe, useful and effective method for upper limb surgeries. Among local anesthetics, ropivacaine has special applications in neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks due to its low cardiotoxicity and less toxicity to central nervous systems compared to bupivacaine and lignocaine. Dexmedetomidine is a newer and potent alpha-2 receptor agonist which has 10 times higher selectivity for alpha-2 receptors as compared to clonidine, So far, very few studies have been undertaken to compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine to provide and prolong postoperative analgesia, especially with the use of ultrasound for nerve localization.

aimsTo compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesia between clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants with 0.5% ropivacaine by ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. SETTINGS AND

designProspective, randomised, double-blind interventional study. SUBJECTS AND

methodsEighty patients of ASA grade I or II undergoing elective upper limb surgery were randomly divided into two groups:- Group RC ( STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The statistical software SPSS version 20 has been used for the analysis. By using Pearson's Chi-Square test for Independence of Attributes/Fisher's Exact. Continuous variables were expressed as Mean, Median, and Standard Deviation and compared across the groups using unpaired

resultsIn our comparative study, dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg

conclusionsThe ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine group in our study provided earlier sensory block and more prolonged postoperative analgesia as compared to ropivacaine-clonidine group. Thus ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination may be effectively used in all painful upper limb surgeries specially orthopaedic procedures.

Indexed as

Analgesiadexmedetomidineorthopaedic surgeriesropivacainesupra-clavicular blockupper limb

Identifiers

PMID34349335
PMCPMC8294414
OpenAlexW3178141410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.