ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches
Effect of Minimally Invasive Pain Intervention in Frozen Shoulder Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Suprascapular Nerve for Shoulder Pain: A Novel Technique Description.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency ablation of suprascapular nerve versus local anaesthetics with steroids in patients with chronic shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdhesive capsulitis or frozen shoulder (FS) is the second most common disorder accounts for 15%-30% shoulder pain and functional disability. Suprascapular nerve (SSN) interventions with corticosteroid alone have shown limited duration efficacy, adding pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) provides long-term relief. AIMS AND
objectiveWe aimed to analyze the efficacy of SSN intervention on pain relief and range of mobility in patients with FS. SETTINGS AND
designThis is a cross-sectional study of 37 patients of FS who underwent SSN interventions in a dedicated pain medicine unit of the department of anesthesiology. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-seven patients, who underwent SSN interventions for FS and followed for 6 months, were included in this study. Pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), range of motion (ROM) (17), and Oxford 12 point Shoulder Score (OSS) for functional outcomes were recorded. In the final analysis, two subsets of patients who underwent SSN steroid injection or SSN PRF plus steroid were found and compared using Student's
resultsThe patient population was demographically comparable. Mean VAS score and ROM improved at 1, 3, and 6 months to statistically significant. On comparing the subgroups, the VAS score and OSS in both the SI and PRF groups were significantly improved, but the PRF group showed highly significant improvement, showing better and sustained improvement in the PRF group.
conclusionPRF with steroid injection of the SSN provides better and long-lasting relief from pain and improved mobility in FS patients in comparison to steroid alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.