Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34349234›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2021

Validity of the Urinary Symptom Questionnaires for people with neurogenic bladder (USQNB) who void or use indwelling catheters.

Rochelle E Tractenberg, Jamie K Frost, Futoshi Yumoto, Amanda K Rounds, Inger H Ljungberg, Suzanne L Groah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. IntravesicalTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rochelle E TractenbergCollaborative for Research on Outcomes and -Metrics, Washington, DC, USA. rochelle.tractenberg@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-2119
Jamie K FrostCollaborative for Research on Outcomes and -Metrics, Washington, DC, USA.
Futoshi YumotoCollaborative for Research on Outcomes and -Metrics, Washington, DC, USA.
Amanda K RoundsMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Inger H LjungbergMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Suzanne L GroahDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1213-1959

Funding

ACL HHS 90IF0121Craig H. Neilsen Foundation 385077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designDescriptive Psychometrics Study

objectivesNeurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), or "neurogenic bladder" is a common and disruptive condition for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and disease (including multiple sclerosis, MS). Our team has developed patient-centered instruments of urinary symptoms specific to patients with NLUTD, across bladder management methods. Validity evidence is needed to support the use of two new instruments, Urinary Symptom Questionnaires for people with Neurogenic Bladder (USQNB) for those who manage their bladder with indwelling catheters (IDC), or who void (V).

settingOnline surveys completed by individuals in the United States with NLUTD due to either SCI or MS who manage their bladder with indwelling catheters (SCI, n = 306; MS, n = 8), or by voiding (SCI, n = 103; MS, n = 383). A total of n = 381 USQNB-IDC respondents (five control groups), and 351 USQNB-V respondents (four control groups), contributed to our convergent and divergent validity evidence.

methodsData were collected online to estimate key aspects of psychometric validity (content, reflection of the construct to be measured; face, recognizability of the contents as representing the construct to be measured; structural, the extent to which the instrument captures recognizable dimensions of the construct to be measured). Divergent and convergent validity evidence was derived from multiple control groups, while evidence of criterion validity was derived from attribution of each item to their experience "with a UTI".

resultsEvidence of face, content, criterion, convergent, and divergent validity was compiled for each instrument.

conclusionsThe instruments demonstrate adequate, multi-dimensional, validity evidence to recommend their use for decision-making by patients, clinicians, and researchers.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicCatheters, IndwellingHumansPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.