Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34349108›Full record

Trial reportBlood cancer journal2021

Marked progress in AL amyloidosis survival: a 40-year longitudinal natural history study.

Andrew Staron, Luke Zheng, Gheorghe Doros, Lawreen H Connors, Lisa M Mendelson, Tracy Joshi, Vaishali Sanchorawala

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and Safety of Anselamimab in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Results From the Randomized CARES Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Clinical features and pathological scoring analysis of hepatic amyloidosis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew StaronAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1638-4873
Luke ZhengDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-4590
Gheorghe DorosAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5524-4721
Lawreen H ConnorsAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-4296
Lisa M MendelsonAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2821-6009
Tracy JoshiAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Vaishali SanchorawalaAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Vaishali.Sanchorawala@bmc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-2445
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent decades have ushered in considerable advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. As disease outcomes improve, AL amyloidosis-unrelated factors may impact mortality. In this study, we evaluated survival trends and primary causes of death among 2337 individuals with AL amyloidosis referred to the Boston University Amyloidosis Center. Outcomes were analyzed according to date of diagnosis: 1980-1989 (era 1), 1990-1999 (era 2), 2000-2009 (era 3), and 2010-2019 (era 4). Overall survival increased steadily with median values of 1.4, 2.6, 3.3, and 4.6 years for eras 1-4, respectively (P < 0.001). Six-month mortality decreased over time from 23% to 13%. Wide gaps in survival persisted amid patient subgroups; those with age at diagnosis ≥70 years had marginal improvements over time. Most deaths were attributable to disease-related factors, with cardiac failure (32%) and sudden unexpected death (23%) being the leading causes. AL amyloidosis-unrelated mortality increased across eras (from 3% to 16% of deaths) and with longer-term survival (29% of deaths occurring >10 years after diagnosis). Under changing standards of care, survival improved and early mortality declined over the last 40 years. These findings support a more optimistic outlook for patients with AL amyloidosis.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Light-chain AmyloidosisLongitudinal StudiesMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedStem Cell TransplantationSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID34349108
PMCPMC8338947
OpenAlexW3187630480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.