Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348948›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Estimated total cardiovascular risk in a rural area of Bangladesh: a household level cross-sectional survey done by local community health workers.

Mohammad Mostafa Zaman, Mohammad Moniruzzaman, Kamrun Nahar Chowdhury, Salma Zareen, Ahm Enayet Hossain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Mostafa ZamanResearch and Publication, WHO Country Office for Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh zamanm@who.int.ORCID 0000-0002-1736-1342
Mohammad MoniruzzamanPublic Health, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-7111
Kamrun Nahar ChowdhuryEpidemiology, National Centre for Control of Rheumatic Fever and Heart Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Salma ZareenDirector, National Centre for Control of Rheumatic Fever and Heart Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ahm Enayet HossainNon-Communicable Diseases Control Programme, Directorate General of Health Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · BDClinical Research Organization · BDDirectorate General of Health Services · BDShiga University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to estimate 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Bangladeshi rural community residents, using the 2014 WHO/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) risk prediction charts. STUDY

designCross-sectional population-based study done by local community healthcare workers engaging the lowest level facilities of the primary healthcare system. SETTING AND

participantsA total of 1545 rural adults aged ≥40 years of Debhata upazila of Satkhira district of Bangladesh participated in this survey done in 2015. The community health workers collected data on age, smoking, blood pressure, blood glucose and treatment history of diabetes and hypertension. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated total 10-year CVD risk using the WHO/ISH South East Asia Region-D charts without cholesterol and categorised the risk into low (<10%), moderate (10%-19.9%), high (20%-29.9%) and very high (≥30%).

resultsThe participants' mean age (±SD) was 53.9±11.6 years. Overall, the 10-year CVD risks (%, 95% CI) were as follows: low risk (81.6%, 95% CI 78.4% to 84.6%), moderate risk (9.9%, 95% CI 7.4% to 12.1%), high risk (5.8%, 95% CI 4.4% to 7.2%) and very high risk (2.8%, 95% CI 1.5% to 4.1%). In women, moderate to very high risks were higher (moderate 12.1%, high 6.1% and very high 3.7%) compared with men (moderate 7.5%, high 5.5% and very high 1.9%) but none of these were statistically significant. The age-standardised prevalence of very high risk increased from 2.9% (0.7%-5.2%) to 8.5% (5%-12%) when those with anti-hypertensive medication having controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) added.

conclusionThe very high-risk estimates could be used for planning resource for CVD prevention programme at upazila level. There is a need for a national level study, covering diversities of rural areas, to contribute to national planning of CVD prevention.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAdultAgedBangladeshCommunity Health WorkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRural Populationcardiac epidemiologydiabetes & endocrinologyhypertensionpreventive medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34348948
PMCPMC8340298
OpenAlexW3187501777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.