Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348890›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in South Korea: Web Crawling Approach.

Hocheol Lee, Eun Bi Noh, Sung Jong Park, Hae Kweun Nam, Tae Ho Lee, Ga Ram Lee, Eun Woo Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hocheol LeeYonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-8843
Eun Bi NohYonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9867-127X
Sung Jong ParkDepartment of Information Statistics, Yonsei University Graduate School, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9633-3632
Hae Kweun NamDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3353-6990
Tae Ho LeeYonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-3629
Ga Ram LeeDepartment of Information Statistics, Yonsei University Graduate School, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-0708
Eun Woo NamYonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-6247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization emphasized vaccination against COVID-19 because physical distancing proved inadequate to mitigate death, illness, and massive economic loss.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate Korean citizens' perceptions of vaccines by examining their views on COVID-19 vaccines, their positive and negative perceptions of each vaccine, and ways to enhance policies to increase vaccine acceptance.

methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed posts on NAVER and Instagram to examine Korean citizens' perception of COVID-19 vaccines. The keywords searched were "vaccine," "AstraZeneca," and "Pfizer." In total 8100 posts in NAVER and 5291 posts in Instagram were sampled through web crawling. Morphology analysis was performed, overlapping or meaningless words were removed, sentiment analysis was implemented, and 3 public health professionals reviewed the results.

resultsThe findings revealed a negative perception of COVID-19 vaccines; of the words crawled, the proportion of negative words for AstraZeneca was 71.0% (476/670) and for Pfizer was 56.3% (498/885). Among words crawled with "vaccine," "good" ranked first, with a frequency of 13.43% (312/2323). Meanwhile, "side effect" ranked highest, with a frequency of 29.2% (163/559) for "AstraZeneca," but 0.6% (4/673) for "Pfizer." With "vaccine," positive words were more frequently used, whereas with "AstraZeneca" and "Pfizer" negative words were prevalent.

conclusionsThere is a negative perception of AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines in Korea, with 1 in 4 people refusing vaccination. To address this, accurate information needs to be shared about vaccines including AstraZeneca, and the experiences of those vaccinated. Furthermore, government communication about risk management is required to increase the AstraZeneca vaccination rate for herd immunity before the vaccine expires.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetRepublic of KoreaVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAstraZenecaCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineinfodemiologyinstagramPfizersentiment analysissocial mediaSouth Koreavaccine perceptionweb crawling

Identifiers

PMID34348890
PMCPMC8428376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.