Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348732›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

The pragmatic, rapid, and iterative dissemination and implementation (PRIDI) cycle: adapting to the dynamic nature of public health emergencies (and beyond).

Reza Yousefi Nooraie, Rachel C Shelton, Kevin Fiscella, Bethany M Kwan, James M McMahon

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Iterative Development of an Interactive Website to Support Shared Decision-Making in Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Designing Digital COVID-19 Screening: Insights and Deliberations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reza Yousefi NooraieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Reza_Yousefi-nooraie@URMC.Rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-7121
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin FiscellaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Bethany M KwanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
James M McMahonSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health emergencies-such as the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic-accelerate the need for both evidence generation and rapid dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence where it is most needed. In this paper, we reflect on how D&I frameworks and methods can be pragmatic (i.e., relevant to real-world context) tools for rapid and iterative planning, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence to address public health emergencies. THE PRAGMATIC, RAPID, AND ITERATIVE D&I (PRIDI) CYCLE: The PRIDI cycle is based on a "double-loop" learning process that recognizes the need for responsiveness and iterative adaptation of implementation cycle (inner loop) to the moving landscapes, presented by the outer loops of emerging goals and desired outcomes, emerging interventions and D&I strategies, evolving evidence, and emerging characteristics and needs of individuals and contexts. Stakeholders iteratively evaluate these surrounding landscapes of implementation, and reconsider implementation plans and activities.

conclusionEven when the health system priority is provision of the best care to the individuals in need, and scientists are focused on development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, planning for D&I is critical. Without a flexible and adaptive process of D&I, which is responsive to emerging evidence generation cycles, and closely connected to the needs and priorities of stakeholders and target users through engagement and feedback, the interventions to mitigate public health emergencies (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic), and other emerging issues, will have limited reach and impact on populations that would most benefit. The PRIDI cycle is intended to provide a pragmatic approach to support planning for D&I throughout the evidence generation and usage processes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthEmergenciesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19D&I modelsPublic health emergenciesRapid cycle

Identifiers

PMID34348732
PMCPMC8335455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.