Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348699›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2021

Characterization of three glutamate decarboxylases from Bacillus spp. for efficient γ-aminobutyric acid production.

Lei Sun, Yingguo Bai, Xiu Zhang, Cheng Zhou, Jie Zhang, Xiaoyun Su, Huiying Luo, Bin Yao, Yuan Wang, Tao Tu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid and Bacillus pumilus reduce arsenic uptake and toxicity in rice.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Expanding the pH range of glutamate decarboxylase fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei SunState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yingguo BaiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiu ZhangNingxia Key Laboratory for the Development and Application of Microbial Resources in Extreme Environments, North Minzu University, Yinchuan, 750021, China.
Cheng ZhouNingxia Key Laboratory for the Development and Application of Microbial Resources in Extreme Environments, North Minzu University, Yinchuan, 750021, China.
Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaoyun SuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huiying LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bin YaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuan WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. wangyuan08@caas.cn.
Tao TuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. tutao@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-0386
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNorth Minzu University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA no. CARS-41National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2102400State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition 2004DA125184G2101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an important bio-product used in pharmaceuticals and functional foods and as a precursor of the biodegradable plastic polyamide 4. Glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) converts L-glutamate (L-Glu) into GABA via decarboxylation. Compared with other methods, develop a bioconversion platform to produce GABA is of considerable interest for industrial use.

resultsThree GAD genes were identified from three Bacillus strains and heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). The optimal reaction temperature and pH values for three enzymes were 40 °C and 5.0, respectively. Of the GADs, GADZ11 had the highest catalytic efficiency towards L-Glu (2.19 mM

conclusionsThree recombinant GADs from Bacillus strains have been conducted functional identification. The engineered E. coli strain heterologous expressing GADZ1, GADZ11, and GADZ20 could accomplish the biosynthesis of L-Glu to GABA in a buffer-free reaction at a high L-Glu concentration. The novel engineered E. coli strain has the potential to be a cost-effective biotransformation platform for the industrial production of GABA.

Indexed as

BacillusBiotransformationEscherichia coligamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamate DecarboxylaseHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationTemperaturegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamate DecarboxylaseBiocatalystBioconversionGlutamate decarboxylaseγ-Aminobutyric acid

Identifiers

PMID34348699
PMCPMC8336373
OpenAlexW3189106252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.