Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348660›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

A national intervention to support frail older adults in primary care: a protocol for an adapted implementation framework.

Joanie Sims-Gould, Jacobi Elliott, Catherine E Tong, Anik Giguère, Sara Mallinson, Paul Stolee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03442426 (Transforming Primary Care for Older Canadians Living With Frailty), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03442426 nacompletednot on this map

Transforming Primary Care for Older Canadians Living With Frailty

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WaterlooRan2017 to 2022Enrolled695ConditionsFrail Elderly SyndromeArmsIntegrated model of primary care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanie Sims-GouldCentre for Hip Health and Mobility, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia & Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jacobi ElliottSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Catherine E TongSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Anik GiguèreDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Sara MallinsonCommunity Health Sciences, University of Calgary / Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Paul StoleeSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. stolee@uwaterloo.ca.
University of Waterloo · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada TG2015-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder Canadians are high users of health care services, however the health care system is not well-designed to meet the complex needs of many older adults. Older persons often look to their primary care practitioners to assess their needs and coordinate their care. The intervention seeks to improve primary care for older persons living with frailty and will be implemented in six primary care clinics in three Canadian provinces. Presently, more than 1.6 million older Canadians are living with frailty, and this is projected to increase to 2.5 million within a decade (Canadian Frailty Network, Frailty Matters, 2020). The model will include frailty screening, an online portal to expedite referrals and improve coordination with community services, and several tools and techniques to support patient and family engagement and shared decision-making. Our project is guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (Damschroder LJ, et al. Implement Scil, 4, 50, 2009). As others have done, we adapted the CFIR for our work. Our adapted framework combines elements of the socio-ecological model, key concepts from the CFIR, and elements from other implementation science frameworks. Nested within a broader mixed-method implementation study, the focus of this paper is to outline our guiding conceptual framework and qualitative methods protocol.

methodsWe will use the adapted CFIR framework to inform the data we collect and our analytic approach. Our work is divided into three phases: (1) baseline assessment of 'usual care'; (2) tailoring and implementing a new primary care model; and (3) evaluation. In each of these phases we will engage in qualitative data collection, including clinical observations, focus groups, in-depth interviews and extensive field notes. At each site we will collect data with health care providers, key informants (e.g., executive directors), and rostered patients ≥ 70 years. We will engage in team-based analysis across multiple sites, three provinces and two languages through regular telephone conferences, a comprehensive analysis codebook, leadership from our Qualitative Working Group and a collective appreciation that "science is a team sport" (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 471, 701-702, 2013). DISCUSSION: Outcomes of this research may be used by other research teams who chose to adapt the CFIR framework to reflect the unique contexts of their work, and clinicians seeking to implement our model, or other models of care for frail older patients in primary care.

trial registrationU.S. National Library of Medicine, NCT03442426 . Registered 22 February 2018- Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health CareFrailtyImplementation scienceOlder adultsPrimary careQualitative researchStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID34348660
PMCPMC8336337
OpenAlexW3191263894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.