Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348650›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Tomato transcriptomic response to Tuta absoluta infestation.

Daniela D'Esposito, Daniele Manzo, Alessandro Ricciardi, Antonio Pietro Garonna, Antonino De Natale, Luigi Frusciante, Francesco Pennacchio, Maria Raffaella Ercolano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TransformingInsects · 2025
    Review
  3. Identification and Characterization of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An effector ofiScience · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dynamic interplay ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela D'Esposito *Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Daniele Manzo *Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro RicciardiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Antonio Pietro GaronnaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Antonino De NataleDepartment of Biology, University of Naples "Federico II", Monte Sant' Angelo, Via Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Luigi FruscianteDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Francesco PennacchioDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Maria Raffaella ErcolanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Università 100, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy. ercolano@unina.it.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe South America pinworm, Tuta absoluta, is a destructive pest of tomato that causes important losses worldwide. Breeding of resistant/tolerant tomato cultivars could be an effective strategy for T. absoluta management but, despite the economic importance of tomato, very limited information is available about its response to this treat. To elucidate the defense mechanisms to herbivore feeding a comparative analysis was performed between a tolerant and susceptible cultivated tomato at both morphological and transcriptome level to highlight constitutive leaf barriers, molecular and biochemical mechanisms to counter the effect of T. absoluta attack.

resultsThe tolerant genotype showed an enhanced constitutive barrier possibly as result of the higher density of trichomes and increased inducible reactions upon mild infestation thanks to the activation/repression of key transcription factors regulating genes involved in cuticle formation and cell wall strength as well as of antinutritive enzymes, and genes involved in the production of chemical toxins and bioactive secondary metabolites.

conclusionsOverall, our findings suggest that tomato resilience to the South America pinworm is achieved by a combined strategy between constitutive and induced defense system. A well-orchestrated modulation of plant transcription regulation could ensure a trade-off between defense needs and fitness costs. Our finding can be further exploited for developing T. absoluta tolerant cultivars, acting as important component of integrated pest management strategy for more sustainable production.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyHost-Parasite InteractionsLarvaMothsPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsRNA-SeqSolanum lycopersicumTranscription FactorsTrichomesPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsComparative transcriptomicsFitnessHerbivorePlant defenseS. lycopersicumSouth America pinworm (Tuta absoluta)Trichomes

Identifiers

PMID34348650
PMCPMC8336066
OpenAlexW3192464625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.