Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34348455›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2022

Clofarabine increases the eradication of minimal residual disease of primary B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to high-dose cytarabine without improvement of outcome. Results from the randomized clinical trial 08-09 of the Cooperative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group.

Gabriele Escherich, Udo Zur Stadt, Arndt Borkhardt, Dagmar Dilloo, Jörg Faber, Tobias Feuchtinger, Thomas Imschweiler, Norbert Jorch, Arnulf Pekrun, Irene Schmid and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01228331 (A Randomized Multi-Center Treatment Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01228331 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Multi-Center Treatment Study (COALL 08-09) to Improve the Survival of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on Behalf of the German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2010 to 2024Enrolled745ConditionsLeukemiaArmsAmsacrine, Clofarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Metabolism of asparagine in the physiological state and cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriele EscherichClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg. escherich@uke.de.
Udo Zur StadtClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Arndt BorkhardtDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf.
Dagmar DillooDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn.
Jörg FaberDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz.
Tobias FeuchtingerDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich.
Thomas ImschweilerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Helios Hospital, Krefeld.
Norbert JorchDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, Bielefeld.
Arnulf PekrunDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte.
Irene SchmidDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich.
Franziska SchrammClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Michael SpohnClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany; Bioinformatics Core Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg.
Martin ZimmermannDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover.
Martin A HorstmannClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg. horstmann@uke.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEBethel University · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelios Klinikum Krefeld · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinikum Bremen-Mitte · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve cure for all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To this end, we investigated the therapeutic potential of clofarabine in primary ALL in trial CoALL 08-09 (clinicaltrials gov. identifier: NCT01228331). The primary study objective was the minimal residual disease (MRD)- based comparative assessment of cytotoxic efficacies of clofarabine 5x40 mg/m2 versus high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) 4x3g/m2, both in combination with PEG-ASP 2,500 IU/m2 as randomized intervention in early consolidation. The secondary objective was an outcome analysis focused on treatment arm dependence and MRD after randomized intervention. In B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL, eradication of MRD was more profound after clofarabine compared to cytarabine, with 93 versus 79 of 143 randomized patients per arm reaching MRD-negativity (c2 test P=0.03, leftsided P [Fisher's exact test]=0.04). MRD status of BCP-ALL after randomized intervention maintained its prognostic relevance, with a significant impact on event-free survival (EFS) and relapse rate. However, no difference in outcome regarding EFS and overall survival (OS) between randomized courses was observed (5-year EFS: clofarabine 85.7, SE=4.1 vs. HIDAC 84.8, SE=4.7 [P=0.96]; OS: 95.7, SE=1.9 vs. 92.2, SE=3.2 [P=0.59]), independent of covariates or overall risk strata. Severe toxicities between randomized and subsequent treatment elements were also without significant difference. In conclusion, clofarabine/PEG-ASP is effective and safe, but greater cytotoxic efficacy of clofarabine compared to HIDAC did not translate into improved outcomes indicating a lack of surrogacy of post-intervention MRD at the trial level as opposed to the patient level, which hampers a broader implementation of this regimen in the frontline treatment of ALL.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLymphoma, Non-HodgkinPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAcute DiseaseChildClofarabineCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm, ResidualTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsClofarabineCytarabine

Identifiers

PMID34348455
PMCPMC9052901
OpenAlexW3187800176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.