ReviewCritical reviews in immunology2021
Could Harnessing Natural Killer Cell Activity Be a Promising Therapy for Prostate Cancer?
Review in Critical reviews in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Siglec-engaging immunosuppressive sialoglycans to suppress prostate cancer bone metastasis.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Human Group IIA Secreted Phospholipase AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Natural killer cell activity in prostate cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy: an observational study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Observational
- A PSMA-Targeted Tri-Specific Killer Engager Enhances NK Cell Cytotoxicity against Prostate Cancer.Cancer immunology research · 2025Article
- Review
- Identification of bicalutamide resistance-related genes and prognosis prediction in patients with prostate cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- The Immunotherapy and Immunosuppressive Signaling in Therapy-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Harnessing natural killer (NK) cell activity, either endogenous NK or NK-cell-based therapy, is in the forefront development for many tumor types. There are compelling clinical evidence demonstrating the significant relevance of loss of NK cell activity with prostate cancer (PCa) disease progression to the lethal phenotype, metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Given that mCRPC is generally regarded as a "cold" tumor and has only elicited marginal response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy to revive CD8 T cell activity, NK cell targeted therapy may present a viable opportunity not only to directly target mCRPC and also to "fire up" the cold mCRPC tumor. However, current efforts on harnessing NK cell activity for treating mCRPC is very limited with only one open NK-cell-based clinical trial. This minireview will present the clinical significance of NK cell activity in controlling metastatic PCa and provide perspectives on harnessing NK cell activity for treating mCRPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.