ArticleHematological oncology2021
Impact of initial chemotherapy regimen on outcomes for patients with double-expressor lymphoma: A multi-center analysis.
Article in Hematological oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic evaluation of double-expressor lymphoma: prognostic impact, determinants of outcome, and comparative efficacy and safety of novel therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- DA-EPOCH-R improves the prognosis of patients with double-expressor lymphoma: A single-center retrospective study and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Zanubrutinib plus R-CHOP for the treatment of newly diagnosed double-expressor lymphoma: A phase 2 clinical study.Cancer · 2025Trial
- Optimizing first-line therapy for double-expressor lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of novel agent-augmented R-CHOP regimens.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Observational
- Treatment outcomes of zanubrutinib-based regimen in newly diagnosed patients with MYC/BCL2 double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective multicenter real-world study.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Recent advancements in double-expressor lymphoma: novel therapeutic approaches and prospects.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Article
- Double‑hit primary lymphoma (MYC and BCL2) in the bilateral ovary: A case report.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Altered pathways and targeted therapy in double hit lymphoma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma featuring overexpression of MYC and B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (double expressor lymphoma, DEL) is associated with poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggesting improved outcomes for DEL with the use of more intensive regimens than R-CHOP is restricted to younger patients and based on limited evidence from low patient numbers. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of intensive frontline regimens versus R-CHOP in a multicenter analysis across 7 academic medical centers in the United States. We collected 90 cases of DEL, 46 out of 90 patients (51%) received R-CHOP and 44/90 (49%) received an intensive regimen, which was predominantly DA-EPOCH-R. Treatment cohorts were evenly balanced for demographics and disease characteristics, though the intensive group had a higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 326 vs. 230 U/L p = 0.06) and presence of B-symptoms (50% vs. 22%, p = 0.01) compared to the R-CHOP cohort. There was no difference in PFS (median 53 vs. 38 months, p = 0.49) or overall survival (67 vs. not reached months, p = 0.14) between the R-CHOP and intensive therapy cohorts, respectively. On multivariate analysis, intensive therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.35 (95% CI 0.74-7.41), though this was not statistically significant. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of intermediate high-risk lymphoma defined by IPI ≥3 did not identify a difference in survival outcomes between regimens. We conclude that in our multi-center cohort there is no evidence supporting the use of intensive regimens over R-CHOP, suggesting that R-CHOP remains the standard of care for treating DEL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.