Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347887›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2021

Exploration of the views and experiences of research healthcare professionals during their redeployment to clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jessry D Veerapen, Eamonn Mckeown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessry D VeerapenCity, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-0017
Eamonn MckeownCity, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to explore the views and experiences of research healthcare professionals towards their redeployment to frontline clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic.

backgroundHealthcare professionals working in research were redeployed during the COVID-19 pandemic to support the delivery of clinical services across the National Health Service. They are experienced clinicians with research knowledge and skills, and specific working patterns. It is important to understand how these professionals were used and supported during their transition to clinical roles during the pandemic.

methodBetween July and September 2020, 15 research healthcare professionals were recruited into this qualitative study. Each participant completed a single semi-structured interview lasting approximately 30-60 min, conducted remotely using a teleconferencing platform. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data analysed by the process of inductive thematic analysis with the assistance of NVivo 12.06 (Nov, 2019).

findingsFour main themes were identified from analysis of the transcripts: (a) initial personal response to the pandemic (subthemes: of anxieties due to unknown disease impact and concern for others); (b) mobilization for clinical redeployment (subthemes: motivations for voluntary redeployment, the professional challenges, personal fears and the organization and preparedness for redeployment); (c) adaptive deployment to clinical roles (subthemes: adapting to new roles and responsibilities, challenges faced and coping mechanisms), (d) reflections and learnings (subthemes: reintegration to original roles and sense of achievement).

conclusionResearch healthcare professionals are highly adaptable professionals equipped with core transferable skills. With the appropriate support, re-familiarization and induction they are a valuable resource during the pandemic response. IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: Research healthcare professionals are experienced practitioners with transferrable skills and strong sense of duty and resilience. Induction programmes to promote recalibration to clinical settings would improve their adaptability, foster confidence and emotional well-being. Careful consideration is required prior to mass redeployment to ensure research continuity in both COVID-19 and other health conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2State MedicineCOVID-19healthcare professionalsredeploymentresearchtransition

Identifiers

PMID34347887
PMCPMC8447063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.