Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347865›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Engagement with a digital therapeutic for smoking cessation designed for persons with psychiatric illness fully mediates smoking outcomes in a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Julia Browne, Tate F Halverson, Roger Vilardaga

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mobile Health Interventions for Substance Use Disorders.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Impact of Digital Health on Smoking Cessation.Interactive journal of medical research · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia BrowneGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-9614
Tate F HalversonDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Roger VilardagaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7252-4343

Funding

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Smoking Cessation Application Tailored to Individuals with Serious Mental Illness.R01DA047301 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VILARDAGA, ROGER · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Innovative Smartphone Application for Quitting Smoking among Seriously Mentally IIIR00DA037276 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VILARDAGA, ROGER · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA037276NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of change of digital therapeutics is a critical step to improve digital health outcomes and optimize their development. Access to and engagement with digital content is arguably a core mechanism of change of these interventions. However, the mediational role of app engagement has been largely unexamined. To evaluate the mediational effect of engaging with a digital therapeutic for smoking cessation designed for adults with psychiatric disorders. Secondary analysis of a pilot clinical trial of 62 adults with serious mental illness who were randomized to receive either a tailored digital therapeutic (Learn to Quit) or a digital therapeutic for the general public (NCI QuitGuide). Engagement was captured using background analytics of app utilization, including (a) number of interactions with app content, (b) minutes/day of app use, and (c) number of days used. The main outcome was reductions in cigarettes per day from baseline to the four-month endpoint. Mediational analysis followed the Preacher and Hayes bootstrap method. Number of application interactions fully mediated reductions in cigarettes per day in the Learn to Quit application but not in QuitGuide (Average Causal Mediation Effect = .31, p = .02). Minutes/day of app use played an uncertain role, and number of days used was not a significant mediator. Results suggest that one of the mechanisms of action of the Learn to Quit device, engagement with theory-based content, functioned as intended. Future research of digital therapeutics should emphasize granular approaches to evaluating apps' mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMobile ApplicationsSmoking CessationAdultHumansPilot ProjectsSmokingDigital therapeuticHealth behaviorMediationmHealthSerious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID34347865
PMCPMC8571710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.