Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347850›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Use of online resources by undergraduate medical students at College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Khalid M Alabdulwahhab, Syed Yousaf Kazmi, Waqas Sami, Khaled Nasser Almujel, Mohammed Hamed Alanazi, Khalid Falah Alanazi, Abdullah Meshal Moyana, Mohammad Shakil Ahmad, Tariq A Alasbali, Fahd Al Alwadani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents' and young adults' experiences at school: A systematic narrative review.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khalid M AlabdulwahhabDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Syed Yousaf KazmiDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Waqas SamiDepartment of Community Medicine & Public Health, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-1190
Khaled Nasser AlmujelMedical Student, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Hamed AlanaziMedical Student, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Falah AlanaziMedical Student, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Meshal MoyanaMedical Student, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Shakil AhmadDepartment of Community Medicine & Public Health, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Tariq A AlasbaliDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Fahd Al AlwadaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current pandemic has revolutionized medical education with a rapid shift to online teaching and learning strategies. The students have coped by turning to the online resources to keep pace with the change. To determine the type and practice of online resources used by undergraduate medical students and compare the use of online resources with gender and GPA. This was a cross-sectional study in which an online self-administered questionnaire was used to evaluate the type and practices of the online resources used by the medical students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Complete enumeration sampling method was used to collect the data from 180 medical students studying at College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia. One hundred and thirty students (72.2%) were unaware of the free online resources offered by the University. Most students (58.3%, n = 105) consulted peers for online references. Male students preferred PowerPoint presentations and consulting online resources for studying as compared to the females, whereas females preferred to study textbooks predominantly as compared to males (p = 0.005). Male students significantly shifted to the online resources during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to females (p = 0.028). Students with the highest GPA scores shifted to online educational resources during pandemic. A significant proportion of the undergraduate medical students at College of Medicine, Majmaah University used online educational resources for learning. We recommend that the college administration for deliberation with the medical educationalists for necessary curricular amendments and taking necessary steps to make the college Academic supervision and mentorship program more proactive to meet the challenges of students' use of online educational resources.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateAdolescentAdultConsumer BehaviorCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaSchools, MedicalStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID34347850
PMCPMC8336793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.