Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347812›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Mental health among healthcare workers and other vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic and other coronavirus outbreaks: A rapid systematic review.

Eleonora P Uphoff, Chiara Lombardo, Gordon Johnston, Lauren Weeks, Mark Rodgers, Sarah Dawson, Catherine Seymour, Antonis A Kousoulis, Rachel Churchill

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resiliency and Mental Health in the ICU.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Changes in anxiety and depression among public health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic response.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eleonora P UphoffCochrane Common Mental Disorders, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Chiara LombardoMental Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Gordon JohnstonMental Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-8932
Lauren WeeksMental Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Mark RodgersCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-9239
Sarah DawsonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Catherine SeymourMental Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Antonis A KousoulisMental Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel ChurchillCochrane Common Mental Disorders, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Mental Health Foundation · GBUniversity of York · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough most countries and healthcare systems worldwide have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, some groups of the population may be more vulnerable to detrimental effects of the pandemic on mental health than others. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise evidence currently available from systematic reviews on the impact of COVID-19 and other coronavirus outbreaks on mental health for groups of the population thought to be at increased risk of detrimental mental health impacts. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of reviews on adults and children residing in a country affected by a coronavirus outbreak and belonging to a group considered to be at risk of experiencing mental health inequalities. Data were collected on symptoms or diagnoses of any mental health condition, quality of life, suicide or attempted suicide. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the online PROSPERO database prior to commencing the review (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=194264).

resultsWe included 25 systematic reviews. Most reviews included primary studies of hospital workers from multiple countries. Reviews reported variable estimates for the burden of symptoms of mental health problems among acute healthcare workers, COVID-19 patients with physical comorbidities, and children and adolescents. No evaluations of interventions were identified. Risk- and protective factors, mostly for healthcare workers, showed the importance of personal factors, the work environment, and social networks for mental health.

conclusionsThis review of reviews based on primary studies conducted in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic shows a lack of evidence on mental health interventions and mental health impacts on vulnerable groups in the population.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelVulnerable PopulationsAdolescentAdultChildCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID34347812
PMCPMC8336853
OpenAlexW3187252108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.