Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347561›Full record

ArticlemAbs

Host cell protein detection gap risk mitigation: quantitative IAC-MS for ELISA antibody reagent coverage determination.

Daniel M Waldera-Lupa, Yvonne Jasper, Pia Köhne, Ronja Schwichtenhövel, Heiner Falkenberg, Thomas Flad, Peter Happersberger, Bernd Reisinger, Alireza Dehghani, Roland Moussa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Analytical Tools for HCP Detection, Identification, and Quantitation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M Waldera-LupaBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Yvonne JasperBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Pia KöhneBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Ronja SchwichtenhövelBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Heiner FalkenbergBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Thomas FladBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Peter HappersbergerAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Bernd ReisingerAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Alireza DehghaniAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Roland MoussaBioanalytics, Protagen Protein Services GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Thomas WaernerAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Protagen (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host cell proteins (HCPs) must be sufficiently cleared from recombinant biopharmaceuticals during the downstream process (DSP) to ensure product quality, purity, and patient safety. For monitoring of HCP clearance, the typical method chosen is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using polyclonal anti-HCP antibodies obtained from an immunization campaign. This polyclonal reagent is a critical factor for functionality and confidence of the ELISA. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the pool of ELISA antibodies covers a broad spectrum of the HCPs that potentially could persist in the final drug substance. Typically, coverage is determined by gel-based approaches. Here, we present a quantitative proteomics approach combined with purification of HCPs by immunoaffinity chromatography (qIAC-MS) for assessment of ELISA coverage. The cell culture fluid (CCF) of a mock fermentation and a recombinant monoclonal antibody product were characterized in detail to investigate whether the HCPs used for immunization of animals accurately represent HCPs that are relevant to the process. Using the qIAC-MS approach, the ELISA antibody coverage was determined for mock fermentation and product CCF, as well as several different DSP intermediates. Here, the use of different controls facilitated the identification and quantification of HCPs present in the polyclonal reagent and those that nonspecifically bound to IAC material. This study successfully demonstrates that the described qIAC-MS approach is not only a suitable orthogonal method to commonly used 2D SDS-PAGE-based analysis for evaluating ELISA antibody coverage, but that it further identifies HCPs covered as well as missed by the ELISA, enabling an improved risk assessment of HCP ELISA.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnimalsCHO CellsCricetulusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalRecombinant Proteinsaffinity purificationbiopharmaceuticalsELISA coverageHCPHost cell proteinIACimmunoaffinity chromatographyimmunoprecipitationmass spectrometryproteomicsqIAC-MS

Identifiers

PMID34347561
PMCPMC8344763
OpenAlexW3191228163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.