Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347520›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

High-Efficiency Genome Editing Based on Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System Enhances Cell Growth and Lactic Acid Production in Pediococcus acidilactici.

Ling Liu, Danlu Yang, Zhiyu Zhang, Tao Liu, Guoquan Hu, Mingxiong He, Shumiao Zhao, Nan Peng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Engineered probiotics.Microbial cell factories · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ling LiuState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Danlu YangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Tao LiuState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Guoquan HuKey Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy (Ministry of Agriculture), Biomass Energy Technology Research Centre, Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Mingxiong HeKey Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy (Ministry of Agriculture), Biomass Energy Technology Research Centre, Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Shumiao ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Nan PengState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-6729
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNBiogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediococcus acidilactici is commonly used for pediocin production and lactic acid fermentation. However, a high-efficiency genome editing tool is unavailable for this species. In this study, we constructed endogenous subtype II-A CRISPR-Cas system-based genome interference plasmids which carried a "repeat-spacer-repeat" cassette in the pMG36e shuttle vector. These plasmids exhibited self-interference activities in P. acidilactici LA412. Then, the genome-editing plasmids were constructed by cloning the upstream/downstream donor DNA into the corresponding interference plasmids to exert high-efficiency markerless gene deletion, gene integration, and point mutation in P. acidilactici LA412. We found that endogenous CRISPR-mediated depletion of the native plasmids enhanced the cell growth and that integration of an l-lactate dehydrogenase gene into the chromosome enhanced both cell growth and lactic acid production.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPediococcus acidilacticiBacterial ProteinsFermentationLactic AcidL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMetabolic EngineeringPoint MutationBacterial ProteinsLactic AcidL-Lactate Dehydrogenaseendogenous CRISPR-Casgenome editinglactate dehydrogenase genelactic acidPediococcus acidilactici

Identifiers

PMID34347520
PMCPMC8478465
OpenAlexW3187478310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.