Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347510›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

The Monod Model Is Insufficient To Explain Biomass Growth in Nitrogen-Limited Yeast Fermentation.

David Henriques, Eva Balsa-Canto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David HenriquesBioprocess Engineering Group, IIM-CSIC, Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-292X
Eva Balsa-CantoBioprocess Engineering Group, IIM-CSIC, Vigo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an essential microorganism in food biotechnology, particularly in wine- and beermaking. During wine fermentation, yeasts transform sugars present in grape juice into ethanol and carbon dioxide. The process occurs under batch conditions and is, for the most part, an anaerobic process. Previous studies linked nitrogen-limited conditions with problematic fermentations, with negative consequences for the performance of the process and the quality of the final product. It is therefore of the highest interest to anticipate such problems through mathematical models. Here, we propose a model to explain fermentations under nitrogen-limited anaerobic conditions. We separated biomass formation into two phases: growth and carbohydrate accumulation. Growth was modeled using the well-known Monod equation, while carbohydrate accumulation was modeled by an empirical function analogous to a proportional controller activated by the limitation of available nitrogen. We also proposed to formulate the fermentation rate as a function of the total protein content when relevant data are available. The final model was used to successfully explain experiments taken from the literature, performed under normal and nitrogen-limited conditions. Our results revealed that the Monod model is insufficient to explain biomass formation kinetics in nitrogen-limited fermentations of S. cerevisiae. The goodness of fit of the model proposed here is superior to that of previously published models, offering the means to predict and, thus, control fermentations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomassCarbohydrate MetabolismFermentationNitrogenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeNitrogenbiomasskinetic modelnitrogen limitedproblematic fermentationsS. cerevisiaewine

Identifiers

PMID34347510
PMCPMC8478448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.