Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347327›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2022

Uptake of slow-release oral morphine as opioid agonist treatment among hospitalised patients with opioid use disorder.

Thomas D Brothers, John Fraser, Emily MacAdam, Brendan Morgan, Duncan Webster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Informing evidence-based medicine for opioid use disorder using pharmacoeconomic studies.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thomas D BrothersDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5570-5556
John FraserMobile Outreach Street Health, North End Community Health Centre, Halifax, Canada.
Emily MacAdamDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5736-2860
Brendan MorganDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Duncan WebsterDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7692-7150
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

Advancing Clinical Research Training within Addiction Residency ProgramsR25DA033211 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI Patrick O'Connor, JEFFREY H. SAMET · 2012 to 2026
$4.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA033211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBuprenorphine and methadone are highly effective first-line medications for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) but are not acceptable to all patients. We aimed to assess the uptake of slow-release oral morphine (SROM) as second-line OAT among medically ill, hospitalised patients with opioid use disorder who declined buprenorphine and methadone.

methodsThis study included consecutive hospitalised patients with untreated moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder referred to an inpatient addiction medicine consultation service, between June 2018 and September 2019, in Nova Scotia, Canada. We assessed the proportion of patients initiating first-line OAT (buprenorphine or methadone) in-hospital, and the proportion initiating SROM after declining first-line OAT. We compared rates of outpatient OAT continuation (i.e., filling outpatient OAT prescription or attending first outpatient OAT clinic visit) by medication type, and compared OAT selection between patients with and without chronic pain, using χ

resultsThirty-four patients were offered OAT initiation in-hospital; six patients (18%) also had chronic pain. Twenty-one patients (62%) initiated first-line OAT with buprenorphine or methadone. Of the 13 patients who declined first-line OAT, seven (54%) initiated second-line OAT with SROM in-hospital. Rates of outpatient OAT continuation after hospital discharge were high (>80%) and did not differ between medications (P = 0.4). Patients with co-existing chronic pain were more likely to choose SROM over buprenorphine or methadone (P = 0.005). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe ability to offer SROM (in addition to buprenorphine or methadone) increased rates of OAT initiation among hospitalised patients. Increasing access to SROM would help narrow the opioid use disorder treatment gap of unmet need.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMethadoneMorphineOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneMorphineaddiction medicinehospitalistopiate substitution treatmentopioid epidemicopioid-related disorder

Identifiers

PMID34347327
PMCPMC8814044
OpenAlexW3188140668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.