Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347251›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2021

Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Biofilms by Air-Based Atmospheric-Pressure DBD Plasma.

S Khosravi, S Jafari, H Zamani, M Nilkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Solutions for Sustainable Food Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Antimicrobial Effects of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Oral Microcosm Biofilms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S KhosraviDepartment of Physics, University Campus 2, University of Guilan, 41447-84475, Rasht, Iran.
S JafariDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, 41335-1914, Rasht, Iran. sjafari@guilan.ac.ir.
H ZamaniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, 41335-1914, Rasht, Iran.
M NilkarDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, 41335-1914, Rasht, Iran.
University of Guilan · IRGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air-based atmospheric-pressure plasma is an effective non-thermal method in deactivating various kinds of microbial biofilms with several advantages, including high bactericidal efficiency and low treatment costs. Bacterial biofilm formation is a major determinant in establishment of bacterial infection and also resistance to antibacterial chemotherapy. This study aims to assess the anti-biofilm potential of air-based atmospheric-pressure DBD plasma against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilms. The biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were exposed to air-based atmospheric-pressure DBD plasma for up to 4 min (control, 30 s, 90 s, 3 min, and 4 min) and their biofilm formation level, viability, and membrane integrity were determined. Based on the results, plasma exposure caused disruption up to 70% and 85% for S. aureus and E. coli biofilms, respectively. The biofilm disruption potential of air-based atmospheric-pressure DBD plasma was confirmed using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Besides, based on confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), plasma exposure caused a significant bacterial inactivation and E. coli was found as more susceptible strain than S. aureus. In conclusion, atmospheric-pressure DBD plasma could be considered an efficient non-thermal approach against bacterial pathogenicity by biofilm disruption and thus prevention of infection establishment.

Indexed as

BiofilmsEscherichia coliPlasma GasesStaphylococcus aureusPlasma GasesAir-based DBD plasmaBiofilm inactivationEscherichia coli biofilmStaphylococcus aureus biofilm

Identifiers

PMID34347251
OpenAlexW3190949656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.