Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347234›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2021

The Sex Pheromone of the Pine Brown-Tail Moth, Euproctis terminalis (Lepidoptera: Erebidae).

Marc Clement Bouwer, Luki-Marie Scheepers, Bernard Slippers, Egmont Richard Rohwer, Jeremy D Allison

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc Clement BouwerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Gauteng, South Africa.
Luki-Marie ScheepersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Gauteng, South Africa.
Bernard SlippersForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Gauteng, South Africa.
Egmont Richard RohwerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Gauteng, South Africa.
Jeremy D AllisonForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Gauteng, South Africa. jeremy.allison@canada.ca.
University of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pine brown tail moth, Euproctis terminalis (Walker 1855), is a periodic pest in pine plantations in South Africa. The larvae feed on pine needles and can cause severe defoliation when population densities are high. Population densities fluctuate temporally and spatially, complicating the prediction of potential growth loss and tree mortality. The aim of this study was to identify the sex pheromone of the pine brown tail moth to provide stakeholders with a tool for monitoring it. Gas chromatography-electroantennogram detection and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analyses of female pheromone gland extracts identified the major component as (Z,Z,Z,Z)-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-ol isobutyrate. Traps baited with (Z,Z,Z,Z)-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-ol isobutyrate caught more males than unbaited traps. A delta trap was shown to be a superior design compared to a bucket funnel trap. This pheromone can now be used for monitoring E. terminalis in pine plantations.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAElectron Transport Complex IVFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryIsobutyratesLarvaMaleMothsPinusSequence Analysis, DNASex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalDNAElectron Transport Complex IVIsobutyratesSex AttractantsPlanted forest pestSurvey and detection(Z,Z,Z,Z)-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-ol isobutyrate

Identifiers

PMID34347234
OpenAlexW3190787090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.