Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347199›Full record

ReviewInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2022

Microbial interactions in alcoholic beverages.

Rafael Torres-Guardado, Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso, Cristina Reguant, Albert Bordons

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular Metabolites fromMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbial communities from distinctFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protective Mechanism ofNutrients · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Using wild yeasts to modulate the aroma profile of low-alcoholic meads.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafael Torres-GuardadoGrup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d´Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-5628
Braulio Esteve-ZarzosoGrup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d´Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-7086
Cristina ReguantGrup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d´Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-1408
Albert BordonsGrup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d´Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain. albert.bordons@urv.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-8740
Universitat Rovira i Virgili · ES

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PGC2018-101852-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the different types of interactions between the microorganisms involved in the fermentation processes of alcoholic beverages produced all over the world from cereals or fruit juices. The alcoholic fermentation converting sugars into ethanol is usually carried out by yeasts, mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can grow directly using fruit sugars, such as those in grapes for wine or apples for cider, or on previously hydrolyzed starch of cereals, such as for beers. Some of these beverages, or the worts obtained from cereals, can be distilled to obtain spirits. Besides S. cerevisiae, all alcoholic beverages can contain other microorganisms and especially in spontaneous fermentation when starter cultures are not used. These other microbes are mostly lactic acid bacteria and other yeasts-the non-Saccharomyces yeasts. The interactions between all these microorganisms are very diverse and complex, as in any natural occurring ecosystem, including food fermentations. To describe them, we have followed a simplified ecological classification of the interactions. The negative ones are amensalism, by which a metabolic product of one species has a negative effect on others, and antagonism, by which one microbe competes directly with others. The positive interactions are commensalism, by which one species has benefits but no apparent effect on others, and synergism, by which there are benefits for all the microbes and also for the final product. The main interactions in alcoholic beverages are between S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces and between yeasts and lactic acid bacteria. These interactions can be related to metabolites produced by fermentation such as ethanol, or to secondary metabolites such as proteinaceous toxins, or are feed-related, either by competition for nutrients or by benefit from released compounds during yeast autolysis. The positive or negative effects of these interactions on the organoleptic qualities of the final product are also revised. Focusing mainly on the alcoholic beverages produced by spontaneous fermentations, this paper reviews the interactions between the different yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in wine, cider, beer, and in spirits such as tequila, mezcal and cachaça.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeWineAlcoholic BeveragesEcosystemFermentationMicrobial InteractionsYeastsAmensalismAntagonismCommensalismSpiritsSynergismWine

Identifiers

PMID34347199
OpenAlexW3191935400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.