Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347160›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Deep convolutional neural network for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical outcomes in patients with HCCs.

Xinming Li, Zhendong Qi, Haiyan Du, Zhijun Geng, Zhipeng Li, Shuping Qin, Xuhui Zhang, Jianye Liang, Xiao Zhang, Wen Liang and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress of radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xinming Li *Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhendong Qi *Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan DuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun GengDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhipeng LiDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shuping QinDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xuhui ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianye LiangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiao ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wen LiangDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wei YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chuanmiao XieDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. xiechm@sysucc.org.cn.
Xianyue QuanDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. quanxianyue2014@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9345

Funding

Clinical Research Starup Program of Southern Medical University by High-level University Construction Funding of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education LC2016PY034Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019A1515011269Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515011305Opening Research Fund of Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation 201905010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to develop and validate a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its clinical outcomes using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in a large population of candidates for surgery.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1116 patients with HCC who had undergone preoperative CECT and curative hepatectomy. Radiological (R), DCNN, and combined nomograms were constructed in a training cohort (n = 892) respectively based on clinicoradiological factors, DCNN probabilities, and all factors; the performance of each model was confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 244). Accuracy and the AUC to predict MVI were calculated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery were recorded.

resultsThe proportion of MVI-positive patients was respectively 38.8% (346/892) and 35.7 % (87/244) in the training and validation cohorts. The AUCs of the R, DCNN, and combined nomograms were respectively 0.809, 0.929, and 0.940 in the training cohorts and 0.837, 0.865, and 0.897 in the validation cohort. The combined nomogram outperformed the R nomogram in the training (p < 0.001) and validation (p = 0.009) cohorts. There was a significant difference in DFS and OS between the R, DCNN, and combined nomogram-predicted groups with and without MVI (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe combined nomogram based on preoperative CECT performs well for preoperative prediction of MVI and outcome. KEY POINTS: • A combined nomogram based on clinical information, preoperative CECT, and DCNN can predict MVI and clinical outcomes of patients with HCC. • DCNN provides added diagnostic ability to predict MVI. • The AUCs of the combined nomogram are 0.940 and 0.897 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeural Networks, ComputerNomogramsRetrospective StudiesCarcinoma, hepatocellularNeural networks, ComputerPrognosisTomography, x-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.