Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347057›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2021

Effect of Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs on US Smokers' Cognitions and Smoking Behavior After 3 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

David R Strong, John P Pierce, Kim Pulvers, Matthew D Stone, Adriana Villaseñor, Minya Pu, Claudiu V Dimofte, Eric C Leas, Jesica Oratowski, Elizabeth Brighton and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02676193 (Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676193 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2016 to 2022Enrolled359ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco SmokingArmsEffect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Examining the Effectiveness of the 2012 Canadian Graphic Warning Label Policy Change by Sex, Income, and Education.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  16. Error in Table.JAMA network open · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David R StrongCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
John P PierceCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Kim PulversDepartment of Psychology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos.
Matthew D StoneHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Adriana VillaseñorHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Minya PuCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Claudiu V DimofteDepartment of Marketing, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Eric C LeasCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Jesica OratowskiHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Elizabeth BrightonHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Samantha HurstHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Sheila KealeyCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Ruifeng ChenHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Karen MesserCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration's implementation of graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packs is under challenge in US courts. Objective: To determine whether GWLs can affect US smokers' perceptions about their cigarettes or health consequences and changes in smoking behavior. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a randomized clinical trial of the effect of a 3-month, real-world experience of cigarettes with GWL packaging. Community recruitment was done from September 2016 through December 2019 of daily smokers from San Diego, California, aged 21 to 65 years, who were not ready to quit. Participants were randomized to purchase and receive cigarettes in 1 of 3 pack designs: GWL, blank, or standard US pack. Data analysis was performed from July 2020 to February 2021. Interventions: The study manufactured GWL cigarette packs (3 versions with Australian-licensed images) and packs devoid of marketing. For 3 months, participants purchased GWL, blank, or standard US pack cigarettes that were delivered to their home. Main Outcomes and Measures: Smoking-related cognitions and behavior were queried by daily and weekly interactive text messages. Smoking behavior was self-reported before and after the intervention by 96% of randomized participants and was biochemically validated on a subsample. Results: The study sample included 357 participants (195 women [54.6%]; mean [SD] age, 39.5 [11.9] years); 116 were randomized to the standard US pack group, 118 were randomized to the GWL pack group, and 125 were randomized to the blank pack group. Over the 3 months, participants who received the GWL packs had reduced positive perceptions of recent cigarettes smoked compared with participants who received the branded US pack (mean difference, -0.46 SD; 95% CI, -0.73 SD to -0.20 SD; P < .001). Health concerns increased in all groups, with a significant increase in the GWL group vs the US pack group (mean difference, 0.35 SD; 95% CI, 0.09 SD to 0.62 SD; P = .002). Quitting cognitions increased in all study groups, with a peak mean change of 0.60 SD for GWL participants vs 0.34 SD for US pack participants (mean difference, 0.55 SD; 95% CI, 0.28 SD to 0.81 SD; P < .001). GWL participants had slightly more cigarette abstinence periods per week than the US pack group, but the difference was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.13). At 3 months, there was no between-group difference in any smoking behavior. The blank pack group was similar to the US pack group on all measures. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the introduction of GWL packs appears to decrease positive perceptions of cigarettes and increase quitting cognitions in the short term. However, additional complementary tobacco control strategies may be necessary for GWL packs to be associated with reduced smoking behavior. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02676193.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProduct LabelingSmokingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34347057
PMCPMC8339936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.